Code:
int str_join(char *a, const char *b) {
int sz =0;
while(*a++) sz++;
char *st = a -1, c;
*st = (char) 32;
while((c = *b++)) *++st = c;
*++st = 0;
return sz;
}
....
char a[] = "StringA";
printf("string-1 length = %d, String a = %s\n", str_join(&a[0],"StringB"), a);
Output:
string-1 length = 7, char *a = StringA StringB
*** stack smashing detected **** : /T02 terminated
Aborted (core dumped)
I don't understand why it's showing stack smashing? and what is *stack smashing? Or is it my compiler's error?
`smash the stack` [C programming] n. On many C implementations it is possible to corrupt the execution stack by writing past the end of an array declared auto in a routine. Code that does this is said to smash the stack, and can cause return from the routine to jump to a random address.
Further, the compiler identifies by comparing with known values that the stack is compromised and generates an error saying: stack smashing detected . To prevent the buffer overflow protection variable and have some insights, we can disable the GCC's protection using the -fno-stack-protector while compiling.
The two most prominent issues which can cause stack smashing are; 1) to write/over-allocate too much data in a given part of the stack, thereby overwriting another part of the stack, and 2) where some external source (malicious or not) overwrote another program's stack, though this is much less common.
Usually, the compiler generates the stack smashing detected error in response to its defense mechanism against buffer overflows. A buffer overflow occurs when the user input exceeds the buffer capacity. The following C code can cause the buffer to overflow if the user enters more than ten characters.
Stack smashing means you've written outside of ("smashed" past/through) the function's storage space for local variables (this area is called the "stack", in most systems and programming languages). You may also find this type of error called "stack overflow" and/or "stack underflow".
In your code, C is probably putting the string pointed to by a
on the stack. In your case, the place that causes the stack-smash is when you increment st
beyond the original a
pointer and write to where it points, you're writing outside the area the C compiler guarantees to have reserved for the original string assigned into a
.
Whenever you write outside an area of memory that is already properly "reserved" in C, that's "undefined behavior" (which just means that the C language/standard doesn't say what happens): usually, you end up overwriting something else in your program's memory (programs typically put other information right next to your variables on the stack, like return addresses and other internal details), or your program tries writing outside of the memory the operating system has "allowed" it to use. Either way, the program typically breaks, sometimes immediately and obviously (for example, with a "segmentation fault" error), sometimes in very hidden ways that don't become obvious until way later.
In this case, your compiler is building your program with special protections to detect this problem and so your programs exits with an error message. If the compiler didn't do that, your program would try to continue to run, except it might end up doing the wrong thing and/or crashing.
The solution comes down to needing to explicitly tell your code to have enough memory for your combined string. You can either do this by explicitly specifying the length of the "a" array to be long enough for both strings, but that's usually only sufficient for simple uses where you know in advance how much space you need. For a general-purpose solution, you'd use a function like malloc
to get a pointer to a new chunk of memory from the operating system that has the size you need/want once you've calculated what the full size is going to be (just remember to call free
on pointers that you get from malloc
and similar functions once you're done with them).
Well, stack smashing or stack buffer overflow is a rather detailed topic to be discussed here, you can refer to this wiki article for more info.
Coming to the code shown here, the problem is, your array a
is not large enough to hold the final concatenated result.
Thereby, by saying
while((c = *b++)) *++st = c;
you're essentially accessing out of bound memory which invokes undefined behavior. This is the reason you're getting the "stack smashing" issue because you're trying to access memory which does not belong to your process.
To solve this, you need to make sure that array a
contains enough space to hold both the first and second string concatenated together. You have to provide a larger destination array, in short.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With