Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What is "energy" in image processing?

Tags:

I've read across several Image Processing books and websites, but I'm still not sure the true definition of the term "energy" in Image Processing. I've found several definition, but sometimes they just don't match.

When we say "energy" in Image processing, what are we implying?

like image 976
Karl Avatar asked Dec 30 '10 13:12

Karl


People also ask

How do you find the energy of an image?

Direct link to this answer[joules/(sec * m^2)] * m^2 * sec = joules. energy = sum(grayImage(:)); Of course that's a proportionality - the value is not the number of joules directly.

How is energy calculated in image processing?

If you calculate Uniformity (also known as Angular Second Moment): Then Energy is just the square root of ASM: In the formula above, refers to the probability (normalized histogram) of the colour intensity at position . and N is the gray level (e.g., 256 in typical grayscale images).

How do you find the energy of a pixel?

We will use the dual gradient energy function: The energy of pixel (x, y) is Δx2(x, y) + Δy2(x, y), where the square of the x-gradient Δx2(x, y) = Rx(x, y)2 + Gx(x, y)2 + Bx(x, y)2, and where the central differences Rx(x, y), Gx(x, y), and Bx(x, y) are the absolute value in differences of red, green, and blue ...

What is energy minimization in image processing?

Energy minimization methods are a very popular tool in image and signal processing. This chapter deals with images defined on a discrete finite set. The energies under consideration can be differentiable or not, convex or not.


1 Answers

The energy is a measure the localized change of the image.

The energy gets a bunch of different names and a lot of different contexts but tends to refer to the same thing. It's the rate of change in the color/brightness/magnitude of the pixels over local areas. This is especially true for edges of the things inside the image and because of the nature of compression, these areas are the hardest to compress and therefore it's a solid guess that these are more important, they are often edges or quick gradients. These are the different contexts but they refer to the same thing.

The seam carving algorithm uses determinations of energy (uses gradient magnitude) to find the least noticed if removed. JPEG represents the local cluster of pixels relative to the energy of the first one. The Snake algorithm uses it to find the local contoured edge of a thing in the image. So there's a lot of different definitions but they all refer to the sort of oomph of the image. Whether that's the sum of the local pixels in terms of the square of absolute brightness or the hard bits to compress in a jpeg, or the edges in Canny Edge detection or the gradient magnitude:

The important bit is that energy is where the stuff is.

The energy of an image more broadly is the distances of some quality between the pixels of some locality.

We can take the sum of the LABdE2000 color distances within a properly weighted 2d gaussian kernel. Here the distances are summed together, the locality is defined by a gaussian kernel and the quality is color and the distance is LAB Delta formula from the year 2000 (Errata: previously this claimed E stood for Euclidean but the distance for standard delta E is Euclidean but the 94 and 00 formulas are not strictly Euclidean and the 'E' stands for Empfindung; German for "sensation"). We could also add up the local 3x3 kernel of the local difference in brightness, or square of brightness etc. We need to measure the localized change of the image.

skull default

In this example, local is defined as a 2d gaussian kernel and the color distance as LabDE2000 algorithm.

skull energy

If you took an image and moved all the pixels and sorted them by color for some reason. You would reduce the energy of the image. You could take a collection of 50% black pixels and 50% white pixels and arrange them as random noise for maximal energy or put them as two sides of the image for minimum energy. Likewise, if you had 100% white pixels the energy would be 0 no matter how you arranged them.

like image 105
Tatarize Avatar answered Sep 21 '22 17:09

Tatarize