i know that django uses unicode strings all over the framework instead of normal python strings. what encoding are normal python strings use ? and why don't they use unicode?
In Python, Strings are by default in utf-8 format which means each alphabet corresponds to a unique code point.
The standard internal strings are Unicode in Python 3 and ASCII in Python 2.
The answer is no: it's unicode, not any specific encoding.
UTF-8 encodes a character into a binary string of one, two, three, or four bytes. UTF-16 encodes a Unicode character into a string of either two or four bytes. This distinction is evident from their names.
In Python 2: Normal strings (Python 2.x str
) don't have an encoding: they are raw data.
In Python 3: These are called "bytes" which is an accurate description, as they are simply sequences of bytes, which can be text encoded in any encoding (several are common!) or non-textual data altogether.
For representing text, you want unicode strings, not byte strings. By "unicode strings", I mean unicode
instances in Python 2 and str
instances in Python 3. Unicode strings are sequences of unicode codepoints represented abstractly without an encoding; this is well-suited for representing text.
Bytestrings are important because to represent data for transmission over a network or writing to a file or whatever, you cannot have an abstract representation of unicode, you need a concrete representation of bytes. Though they are often used to store and represent text, this is at least a little naughty.
This whole situation is complicated by the fact that while you should turn unicode into bytes by calling encode
and turn bytes into unicode using decode
, Python will try to do this automagically for you using a global encoding you can set that is by default ASCII, which is the safest choice. Never depend on this for your code and never ever change this to a more flexible encoding--explicitly decode when you get a bytestring and encode if you need to send a string somewhere external.
Hey! I'd like to add some stuff to other answers, unfortunately I don't have enough rep yet to do that properly :-(
FWIW, Mike Graham's post is pretty good and that's probably what you should be reading first.
Here's a few comments:
from __future__ import unicode_literals
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
. For more information see PEP 0263. Changing the source encoding affects how Unicode literals (regardless of their prefix or lack of prefix, as affected by point 1) are interpreted. In Py3k, the default file encoding is UTF-8.str
in py3k, unicode
in 2.x) because at some point in time stuff's going to have to be written to memory. Ideally, this would never be evident to the end-user. Unfortunately nothing's perfect and you can occasionally run into problems with this: specifically if you use funky squiggles outside of the Unicode Base Multilingual Plane. Since Python 2.2, we've had what's called wide builds and narrow builds; these names refer to the type used internally to store Unicode code points. Wide builds use UCS-4, which uses 4 bytes to store a Unicode code point. (This means UCS-4's code unit size is 4 bytes, or 32 bits.) Narrow builds use UCS-2. UCS-2 only has 16 bits, and therefore can not encode all Unicode code points accurately (it's like UTF-16, except without the surrogate pairs). To check, test the value of sys.maxunicode
. If it's 1114111
, you've got a wide build (which can correctly represent all of Unicode). If it's less, well, don't fret too much. The BMP (code points 0x0000
to 0xFFFF
) covers most people's needs. For more information, see PEP 0261.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With