In the documentation it says,
"Pass the RunPython.noop method to code or reverse_code when you want the operation not to do anything in the given direction. This is especially useful in making the operation reversible."
The command you are looking for is squashmigrations. It will merge all the unapplied migrations of a given app into a single file. Show activity on this post. This is not a problem, Django runs migrations from top to bottom, meaning: your latest migration file will wait until other previous migration files are ran.
django-test-migrations Set some migration as a starting point. Create some model's data that you want to test. Run the new migration that you are testing. Assert the results!
In the current version of Django you can rename the model and run python manage.py makemigrations , django will then ask if you want to rename the model and if you select yes, then all renaming process will be done automatically.
Sometimes it is possible that you want to revert a migration. For example you have added a field, but now you want to bring the database back to the state before the migration. You can do this by reverting the migration [Django-doc] with the command:
python3 manage.py migrate app_name previous_migration_name
Then Django will look how it can migrate back the the previous_migration_name
and perform the operations necessary. For example if you renamed a field from foo
to bar
, then Django will rename it from bar
back to foo
.
Other operations are not reversible. For example if you remove a field in the migration, and that field has no default and is non-NULL
able, then this can not be reversed. This makes sense since the reverse of removing a field is adding a field, but since there is no value to take for the existing records, what should Django fill in for that field that is recreated for the existing records?
A RunPython
command is by default not reversible. In general in computer science one can not computationally determine the reverse of a function if any exists. This is a consequence of Rice's theorem [wiki]. But sometimes it is possible. If we for example constructed a migration where we incremented a certain field with one, then the reverse is to decrement all the fields with one, for example:
from django.db.models import F
from django.db import migrations
def forwards_func(apps, schema_editor):
MyModel = apps.get_model('my_app', 'MyModel')
db_alias = schema_editor.connection.alias
MyModel.objects.using(db_alias).all().update(
some_field=F('some_field')+1
])
def reverse_func(apps, schema_editor):
MyModel = apps.get_model('my_app', 'MyModel')
db_alias = schema_editor.connection.alias
MyModel.objects.using(db_alias).all().update(
some_field=F('some_field')-1
])
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
dependencies = []
operations = [
migrations.RunPython(code=forwards_func, reverse_code=reverse_func),
]
But sometimes it is possible that a (data)migration does nothing when you migrate it forward, or more common when you migrate it backwards. Instead of each time implementing an empty function, you can then pass a reference to noop
, which does nothing:
from django.db.models import F
from django.db import migrations
def forwards_func(apps, schema_editor):
# … some action …
pass
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
dependencies = []
operations = [
migrations.RunPython(code=forwards_func, reverse_code=migrations.RunPython.noop),
]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With