I have come across the following code in the Linux Kernel source (2.6.32).
do_wait_for_common(struct completion *x, long timeout, int state)
{
if (!x->done) {
/* some code here */
}
x->done--;
return timeout ?: 1; <--- What it returns?
}
To understand the behavior, I have manually tried the following code
#include <stdio.h>
int f(int x)
{
return x?:1;
}
int main()
{
printf("f %d\n", f(0));
printf("f %d\n", f(1));
return 0;
}
And got the following output
f 1
f 1
And when I change it to
int f(int x)
{
return x?:2;
}
I am getting
f 2
f 1
I just want to know whether this behavior (return 1 if nothing mentioned) is mentioned in the standard.
x == y compares x and y . The result of x == y will be true if x and y are equal, false otherwise. In C, true is equivalent to any non-zero value (default is 1) and false is equivalent to zero. So, if x is equal to y , x == y is equal to 1.
a = b means you're assigning the current value of b to a, so if a is 5, and b is 6. a=b would change a = 6 by refference. a == b simply comparing the current value of a to b and it returns a boolean.
The result of AND is 1 only if both bits are 1. The | (bitwise OR) in C or C++ takes two numbers as operands and does OR on every bit of two numbers. The result of OR is 1 if any of the two bits is 1. The ^ (bitwise XOR) in C or C++ takes two numbers as operands and does XOR on every bit of two numbers.
|= just assigns the bitwise OR of a variable with another to the one on the LHS.
This behavior is not mentioned in C standard. Its a GCC extension.
The middle operand in a conditional expression may be omitted. Then if the first operand is nonzero, its value is the value of the conditional expression.
Therefore, the expression
x ? : y
has the value of
x
if that is nonzero; otherwise, the value ofy
.This example is perfectly equivalent to
x ? x : y
In this simple case, the ability to omit the middle operand is not especially useful. When it becomes useful is when the first operand does, or may (if it is a macro argument), contain a side effect. Then repeating the operand in the middle would perform the side effect twice. Omitting the middle operand uses the value already computed without the undesirable effects of recomputing it.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With