In Workarounds for no 'rvalue references to *this' feature, I see the following member function (a conversion operator):
template< class T > struct A { operator T&&() && // <-- What does the second '&&' mean? { // ... } };
What does the second pair of &&
mean? I am not familiar with that syntax.
Speaking of the meaning of the song, Vegard characterizes it as coming from "a genuine wonder of what the fox says, because we didn't know". Although interpreted by some commentators as a reference to the furry fandom, the brothers have stated they did not know about its existence when producing "The Fox".
One of the most common fox vocalizations is a raspy bark. Scientists believe foxes use this barking sound to identify themselves and communicate with other foxes. Another eerie fox vocalization is a type of high-pitched howl that's almost like a scream.
On your phone, touch and hold the Home button or say "Hey Google." Ask "What's this song?" Play a song or hum, whistle, or sing the melody of a song. Hum, whistle, or sing: Google Assistant will identify potential matches for the song.
This is a ref-value qualifier. Here is a basic example:
// t.cpp #include <iostream> struct test{ void f() &{ std::cout << "lvalue object\n"; } void f() &&{ std::cout << "rvalue object\n"; } }; int main(){ test t; t.f(); // lvalue test().f(); // rvalue }
Output:
$ clang++ -std=c++0x -stdlib=libc++ -Wall -pedantic t.cpp $ ./a.out lvalue object rvalue object
Taken from here.
It indicates that the function can be invoked only on rvalues.
struct X { //can be invoked on lvalue void f() & { std::cout << "f() &" << std::endl; } //can be invoked on rvalue void f() && { std::cout << "f() &&" << std::endl; } }; X x; x.f(); //invokes the first function //because x is a named object, hence lvalue X().f(); //invokes the second function //because X() is an unnamed object, hence rvalue
Live Demo output:
f() & f() &&
Hope that helps.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With