How does git determine that a particular merge has a conflict and what the conflict is?
My guess would go something like this: if the two commits being merged have a common parent commit, and if they have both changed line X from what the parent had, that's a conflict.
What complicates my understanding is:
Can anybody explain how this works, or point me to a link that does?
Git can handle most merges on its own with automatic merging features. A conflict arises when two separate branches have made edits to the same line in a file, or when a file has been deleted in one branch but edited in the other. Conflicts will most likely happen when working in a team environment.
Instead, Git uses an algorithm to determine what bits of a file have changed and if any of those bits could represent a conflict. For simple text files, Git uses an approach known as the longest common subsequence algorithm to perform merges and to detect merge conflicts.
To see the beginning of the merge conflict in your file, search the file for the conflict marker <<<<<<< . When you open the file in your text editor, you'll see the changes from the HEAD or base branch after the line <<<<<<< HEAD .
Often, merge conflicts happen when people make different changes to the same line of the same file, or when one person edits a file and another person deletes the same file. You must resolve all merge conflicts before you can merge a pull request on GitHub.
Basically, with git, every merge is a conflict, which leaves you with an index that contains three versions of each file, the versions from each branch and the base. On this index, various resolvers are run, which can decide for each individual file how to resolve the matter.
The first stage is a trivial resolver, which takes care of things like unchanged files, cases where one branch has modified a file while the other didn't, or where both branches contain the same new version of the file.
Afterwards, it's plugins that look at the remaining cases. There is a plugin that handles text files by identifying individual changes (like diff) in one branch and trying to apply those to the other branch, falling back on placing conflict markers if that doesn't work. You can easily hook in your own merge tool at this point, for example, you could write a tool that knows how to merge XML files without violating well-formedness, or that gives a graphical user interface that allows interactive editing and a side-by-side view (for example, kdiff3 does that).
So the presentation of conflicts is really a matter of the plugin used; the default plugin for text files will use the same style as CVS did, because people and tools are used to it, and the conflict markers are a known syntax error in almost any programming language.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With