Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What are the major drawbacks to using OpenOffice DB vs. Microsoft Access?

I know that Open Office Database uses a java database backend. Does anyone have any insight on how this compares to the Jet Database Engine?

Also is the query designer/reporting nearly as robust as MS Access?

like image 411
Joshery Avatar asked Oct 21 '08 20:10

Joshery


People also ask

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using OpenOffice?

In OpenOffice you have the ability to open new files from any of the OpenOffice programs. One of the drawbacks of choosing to use OpenOffice is that it has a higher memory and CPU usage than other office suites.

What is the difference between Microsoft Office vs OpenOffice?

Now, you must be aware of the difference between Microsoft Office vs OpenOffice, and it is clear from the picture that MS Office has the upper hand over Open Office. Now comparing the features and advantages of both Microsoft Office and OpenOffice suite, you can choose which suite would be helpful to you.

What is the OpenOffice equivalent of Microsoft Access?

The OpenOffice equivalent of Access is called Base. Base has its own file format — .odb – and it isn’t able to open .accdb files created in Access. Base isn’t any better than Access, except that it is free. There are still versions of OpenOffice available for free.

What are the advantages of Microsoft Access over other databases?

Pretty much anything that is based in Windows has the potential of being able to integrate with Microsoft Access. This includes SQL, Sybase, and Oracle for front-end or back-end tables. It is also easier to maintain than other systems that may offer larger database applications. 3. It offers a large amount of storage capacity.


1 Answers

It's odd for me to say this, because I'm not a fan of Access at all. However, I think Access is actually the nicer product here, for a number of reasons:

  • It's been around a lot longer (maturity)
  • The core db engine is included with windows.
  • There's an easily distributable runtime if your users don't already have Access and you need to distribute an application.
  • Over the years it's had enough people try to use it for things it's not designed to do (web sites, workgroups) that they've put enough work into performance and concurrency so the two more recent incarnations (2003, 2007) are actually very robust if you're doing something it is designed to do (desktop crud app, talking to linked sql server tables, very small workgroup). (I guess this is really the same as the first point)

On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with the OpenOffice DB, and it's free.

like image 87
Joel Coehoorn Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 00:10

Joel Coehoorn