I can't really grasp the purpose of having a vendor folder. Based on what I learned, it seems the vendor folder is only beneficial if you're trying to make your repo compatible with golang versions earlier than 1.11
. We are running golang 1.12.14
.
When I brought this up to my coworker he said:
Please use vendor with modules - go doesn't have a global artifactory. this is, currently, the best option to make sure you have hermetic builds and your code doesn't break when somebody changes something in their repo.
I thought this is what Go modules does? I asked this question and a commenter is saying I shouldn't use vendor? Does it make sense to add `go mod vendor` to a pre-commit hook?
Go modules bring the guarantee that you will be able to build your packages deterministically by locking down the dependencies into a go.sum
. That being said, the promise to deterministically build your project only stands if your dependencies are still accessible in the future. You don't know if this is going to be the case.
Vendoring on the other hand, with or without Go modules, brings stronger guarantees as it enables to commit the dependencies next to the code. Thus even if the remote repository is no longer accessible (deleted, renamed, etc), you will still be able to build your project.
Another alternative is to use Go modules along with a proxy. You can find more information in the official documentation. You can also look at some OSS implementations like gomods/athens or goproxy/goproxy. If you don't feel like setting up and maintaining your own proxy, some commercial offers are available on the market.
So should you go mod vendor
each time you commit? Well it's ultimately up to you dependending on the kind of guarantees you want. But yes leveraging a proxy or vendoring your dependencies help getting closer to reproducable builds.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With