I'm in the proccess of learning the language and this is a noob doubt.
Is it possible to use a virtual friend function? I don't know if it's possible, I didn't even test it but it could be useful in some situations. For example, for the overloaded operator<<().
DerivedClass dc;
BaseClass &rbc = dc;
cout << rbc;
My guess is it's possible, but I'm not sure since a friend function is not implemented in the class design, and theoretically is not part of it (though in this example, conceptually it makes sense that operator<<() should be a method, but due to syntax limitations it's not possible to implement it as one).
EDIT: my concern is related with this example:
BaseClass bc;
DerivedClass dc;
BaseClass *pArr[2];
pArr[1] = bc;
pArr[2] = dc;
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
cout << pArr[i];
in this array of mixed objects, I want the correct operator<<() called for each one.
Nope, friend
virtual
functions doesn't make sense at all.
friend
functions are such, that are not methods (a.k.a. member functions) and have the right to access private
/protected
members of a class
.
virtual
functions can only be member functions. You can't have virtual
non-member function.
You can make the operator<<
take a reference to a base class and then call some virtual
member function. This way, you can make the operator<<
"almost virtual" :)
For example
class A
{
public:
virtual void f() const { std::cout << "base"; }
};
class B: public A
{
public:
virtual void f() const { std::cout << "derived"; }
};
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const A& a )
{
a.f();
return os;
}
int main()
{
B b;
std::cout << b << std::endl;
return 0;
}
will print derived
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With