I am migrating a platform which used Passlib 1.6.2 to generate password hashes. The code to encrypt the password is (hash is called with default value for rounds):
from passlib.hash import pbkdf2_sha512 as pb
def hash(cleartext, rounds=10001):
return pb.encrypt(cleartext, rounds=rounds)
The output format looks like (for the password "Patient3" (no quotes)):
$pbkdf2-sha512$10001$0dr7v7eWUmptrfW.9z6HkA$w9j9AMVmKAP17OosCqDxDv2hjsvzlLpF8Rra8I7p/b5746rghZ8WrgEjDpvXG5hLz1UeNLzgFa81Drbx2b7.hg
And "Testing123"
$pbkdf2-sha512$10001$2ZuTslYKAYDQGiPkfA.B8A$ChsEXEjanEToQcPJiuVaKk0Ls3n0YK7gnxsu59rxWOawl/iKgo0XSWyaAfhFV0.Yu3QqfehB4dc7yGGsIW.ARQ
I can see that represents:
The Passlib algorithm is defined on their site and reads:
All of the pbkdf2 hashes defined by passlib follow the same format, $pbkdf2-digest$rounds$salt$checksum.
$pbkdf2-digest$ is used as the Modular Crypt Format identifier ($pbkdf2-sha256$ in the example). digest - this specifies the particular cryptographic hash used in conjunction with HMAC to form PBKDF2’s pseudorandom function for that particular hash (sha256 in the example). rounds - the number of iterations that should be performed. this is encoded as a positive decimal number with no zero-padding (6400 in the example). salt - this is the adapted base64 encoding of the raw salt bytes passed into the PBKDF2 function. checksum - this is the adapted base64 encoding of the raw derived key bytes returned from the PBKDF2 function. Each scheme uses the digest size of its specific hash algorithm (digest) as the size of the raw derived key. This is enlarged by approximately 4/3 by the base64 encoding, resulting in a checksum size of 27, 43, and 86 for each of the respective algorithms listed above.
I found passlib.net which looks a bit like an abandoned beta and it uses '$6$' for the algorithm. I could not get it to verify the password. I tried changing the algorithm to $6$ but I suspect that in effect changes the salt as well.
I also tried using PWDTK with various values for salt and hash, but it may have been I was splitting the shadow password incorrectly, or supplying $ in some places where I should not have been.
Is there any way to verify a password against this hash value in .NET? Or another solution which does not involve either a Python proxy or getting users to resupply a password?
I quickly knocked together a .NET implementation using zaph's logic and using the code from JimmiTh on SO answer. I have put the code on GitHub (this is not supposed to be production ready). It appears to work with more than a handful of examples from our user base.
As zaph said the logic was:
[0] - Nothing, [1] - Algorithm, [2] - Iterations, [3] - Salt and [4] - HashIf you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With