I have a dataframe capturing several measures over time that I would like to visualize a 3x1 facet. However, each measure contains different units/scales that would benefit from custom transformations and labeling schemes.
So, my question is: If the units and scales are different across different facets, how can I specify a custom formatter or transformation (i.e., log10) to a particular axis within a facet?
For example, let's say I have the data:
df = data.frame(dollars=10^rlnorm(50,0,1), counts=rpois(50, 100)) melted.df = melt(df, measure.var=c("dollars", "counts"))
How would one go upon setting up a 2x1 facet showing dollars and counts over the index with labels=dollars
and scale_y_continuous(trans = "log10", ...)
for the df$dollars
data?
Thank you!
Facet labels can be modified using the option labeller , which should be a function. In the following R code, facets are labelled by combining the name of the grouping variable with group levels. The labeller function label_both is used.
By default, the size of the label is given by the Facets, here it is 9. But we can change the size. For that, we use theme() function, which is used to customize the appearance of plot. We can change size of facet labels, using strip.
facet_grid() forms a matrix of panels defined by row and column faceting variables. It is most useful when you have two discrete variables, and all combinations of the variables exist in the data. If you have only one variable with many levels, try facet_wrap() .
facet_wrap() makes a long ribbon of panels (generated by any number of variables) and wraps it into 2d. This is useful if you have a single variable with many levels and want to arrange the plots in a more space efficient manner. You can control how the ribbon is wrapped into a grid with ncol , nrow , as.
As you discovered, there isn't an easy solution to this, but it comes up a lot. Since this sort of thing is asked so often, I find it helpful to explain why this is hard, and suggest a potential solution.
My experience has been that people coming to ggplot2 or lattice graphics fundamentally misunderstand the purpose of faceting (or trellising, in lattice). This feature was developed with a very specific idea in mind: the visualization of data across multiple groups that share a common scale. It comes from something called the principle of small multiples, espoused by Tufte and others.
Placing panels next to each other with very different scales is something that visual design experts will tend to avoid, because it can be at best misleading. (I'm not scolding you here, just explaining the rationale...)
But of course, once you have this great tool out in the open, you never know how folks are going to use it. So it gets stretched: the requests come in for the ability to allows the scales to vary by panel, and to set various aspects of the plot separately for each panel. And so faceting in ggplot2 has been expanded well beyond its original intent.
One consequence of this is that some things are difficult to implement simply due to the original design intent of the feature. This is likely one such instance.
Ok, enough explanation. Here's my solution.
The trick here is to recognize that you aren't plotting graphs that share a scale. To me, that means you shouldn't even be thinking of using faceting at all. Instead, make each plot separately, and arrange them together in one plot:
library(gridExtra) p1 <- ggplot(subset(melted.df,variable == 'dollars'), aes(x = value)) + facet_wrap(~variable) + geom_density() + scale_x_log10(labels = dollar_format()) p2 <- ggplot(subset(melted.df,variable == 'counts'), aes(x = value)) + facet_wrap(~variable) + geom_density() grid.arrange(p1,p2)
I've just guessed at what geom_*
you wanted to use, and I'm sure this isn't really what you wanted to plot, but at least it illustrates the principle.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With