There is some strange code using VLA (Variable Length Arrays) which is treated as Valid C (C99, C11) by gcc 4.6:
$ cat a.c int main(int argc,char**argv) { struct args_t{ int a; int params[argc]; // << Wat? // VLA in the middle of some struct, between other fields int b; } args; args.b=0; for(args.a=0;args.a<argc;args.a++) { args.params[args.a]=argv[0][0]; args.b++; } return args.b; }
This code compiled without warnings:
$ gcc-4.6 -Wall -std=c99 a.c && echo $? 0 $ ./a.out ; echo $? 1 $ ./a.out 2; echo $? 2 $ ./a.out 2 3; echo $? 3
Same for -std=c1x
:
$ gcc-4.6 -Wall -std=c1x a.c && echo $? 0
But this does not work with Intel C Compiler or with Clang+LLVM:
$ icc a.c -o a.icc a.c(5): warning #1361: variable-length array field type will be treated as zero-length array field type int params[argc]; ^ $ ./a.icc; echo $? 47 $ clang a.c -o a.clang a.c:5:10: error: fields must have a constant size: 'variable length array in structure' extension will never be supported int params[argc]; ^ 1 error generated.
So:
C supports variable sized arrays from C99 standard. For example, the below program compiles and runs fine in C. NOTE: In C99 or C11 standards, there is feature called flexible array members, which works same as the above.
The biggest problem is that one can not even check for failure as they could with the slightly more verbose malloc'd memory. Assumptions in the size of an array could be broken two years after writing perfectly legal C using VLAs, leading to possibly very difficult to find issues in the code.
Allocation. The GNU C Compiler allocates memory for VLAs with automatic storage duration on the stack. This is the faster and more straightforward option compared to heap-allocation, and is used by most compilers. VLAs can also be allocated on the heap and internally accessed using a pointer to this block.
6.18 Arrays of Length Zero. Declaring zero-length arrays is allowed in GNU C as an extension.
GCC does not allow it, compile with -std=c99 -pedantic-errors
. A VLA inside a struct is apparently a (poorly documented) non-standard GNU C feature. See this.
The standard is pretty clear that VLAs are not allowed in a struct
:
6.7.2.1 Structure and union specifiers
9 - A member of a structure or union may have any complete object type other than a variably modified type. [...]
Variably modified types are (as you might expect) those derived from a variable length array (e.g. by adding array dimensions or cv qualifiers):
6.7.6 Declarators
3 - [...] If, in the nested sequence of declarators in a full declarator, there is a declarator specifying a variable length array type, the type specified by the full declarator is said to be variably modified. Furthermore, any type derived by declarator type derivation from a variably modified type is itself variably modified.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With