I have been trying to figure out if there are any differences between these constructors. Assuming there is a Foo() constructor that takes no arguments, are all these constructors going to have the same result?
public Foo()
: this()
{
blah;
blah;
blah;
}
public Foo()
{
this();
blah;
blah;
blah;
}
public Foo()
{
this = new Foo();
blah;
blah;
blah;
}
I would steer clear of assigning to this
in structs. As you can see from the other answers, the very possibility of it is fairly rarely known (I only know because of some weird situation where it turned up in the spec). Where you've got it, it doesn't do any good - and in other places it's likely to be mutating the struct, which is not a good idea. Structs should always be immutable :)
EDIT: Just to make people go "meep!" a little - assigning to this
isn't quite the same as just chaining to another constructor, as you can do it in methods too:
using System;
public struct Foo
{
// Readonly, so must be immutable, right?
public readonly string x;
public Foo(string x)
{
this.x = x;
}
public void EvilEvilEvil()
{
this = new Foo();
}
}
public class Test
{
static void Main()
{
Foo foo = new Foo("Test");
Console.WriteLine(foo.x); // Prints "Test"
foo.EvilEvilEvil();
Console.WriteLine(foo.x); // Prints nothing
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With