Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Using PowerMock with Spock

I have a class with a few static methods.I need to Mock these static methods. I know PowerMock does this,but I was not able to find any tutorials/materials that shed some light on "Spock+PowerMock" integration. I prefer Spock to Junit,hence the conundrum. Is there a way of getting these 2 frameworks to play ball?Any help is much appreciated.Sample code,even more so.

Update: Current Status of the Approach

Spock behaving weirdly

like image 655
Avinash Avatar asked Oct 21 '13 11:10

Avinash


People also ask

What is powermock and how does it work?

This is where the PowerMock framework comes into play. PowerMockito is a PowerMock's extension API to support Mockito. It provides capabilities to work with the Java Reflection API in a simple way to overcome the problems of Mockito, such as the lack of ability to mock final, static or private methods.

Can powermock mock static methods?

PowerMock is a mocking framework that extends other mocking frameworks to provide much needed additional functionality. This blog takes a look at PowerMock's ability to mock static methods, providing an example of mocking the JDK’s ResourceBundle class, which as many of you know uses ResourceBundle.getBundle(...) to, well... load resource bundles.

Is it possible to use powermock to validate a method?

But if your test only require to validate that a method was called and that’s it, the you can do it as well using powermock. In above test example, using verify (mock) method, we are verifying the saveEmployee (employee) was invoked indeed.

What is powermockito?

PowerMockito is a PowerMock's extension API to support Mockito. It provides capabilities to work with the Java Reflection API in a simple way to overcome the problems of Mockito, such as the lack of ability to mock final, static or private methods. This tutorial will give an introduction to the PowerMockito API and how it is applied in tests.


2 Answers

Since Powermock Version 1.6.0, powermock allows the delegation of the test runner.

This allows the wrapping of the Spock test runner (Sputnik) within the PowerMock test runner framework. Sputnik will then start the test case specifications, and still allow the use of the PowerMock framework.

With JUnit4 and Powermock, I use the following template for accessing static classes.

The test class:

package mypackage;

import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunnerDelegate
import org.spockframework.runtime.Sputnik
import spock.lang.Specification

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PowerMockRunnerDelegate(Sputnik.class)
@PrepareForTest([MyStaticMethodClass.class])
class MyTestForClassTest extends Specification {

    def myStaticMethodClass

    def setup() {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(MyStaticMethodClass.class)
        myStaticMethodClass= Mock(MyStaticMethodClass)
        PowerMockito.when(MyStaticMethodClass.getInstance()).thenReturn(myStaticMethodClass)
    }

    @Unroll
    def "#TestCase policy RF210 triggered"() {
    given: "a product list for the policy"
    myStaticMethodClass.someInstanceMethod() >> "my return value"
    classUnderTest = new ClassUnderTest()
    ...

The dependencies

  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
    <artifactId>mockito-all</artifactId>
    <version>1.10.19</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
  </dependency>

  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
    <artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
    <version>1.7.4</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
  </dependency>

  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
    <artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
    <version>1.7.4</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
  </dependency>

    <dependency>
        <groupId>org.spockframework</groupId>
        <artifactId>spock-core</artifactId>
        <version>1.3-groovy-2.5</version>
        <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>

    <dependency>
        <groupId>cglib</groupId>
        <artifactId>cglib-nodep</artifactId>
        <version>3.3.0</version>
        <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>
like image 50
sweetfa Avatar answered Nov 02 '22 06:11

sweetfa


I was stuck here for a while too. After searching for hours, I saw this github repo: https://github.com/kriegaex/Spock_PowerMock.

I tried adding a PowerMockRule which essentially enabled me to use PowerMock together with Spock. I had to add these dependencies. Version is at 1.5.4

   <dependency>
      <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
      <artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
      <version>${powermock.version}</version>
      <scope>test</scope>
   </dependency>

   <dependency>
        <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
        <artifactId>powermock-module-junit4-rule</artifactId>
        <version>${powermock.version}</version>
        <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>

    <dependency>
        <groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
        <artifactId>powermock-classloading-xstream</artifactId>
        <version>${powermock.version}</version>
        <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>

My class looks like this:

import org.junit.Rule
import org.mockito.Mockito
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.rule.PowerMockRule
import spock.lang.Specification

@PrepareForTest([SomeStaticClass.class])
public class FlightFormSpec extends Specification { 

    @Rule PowerMockRule powerMockRule = new PowerMockRule();

    def "When mocking static"() {
        setup :
            PowerMockito.mockStatic(SomeStaticClass.class)

        when :
            Mockito.when(SomeStaticClass.someStaticMethod()).thenReturn("Philippines!");

        then :
            SomeStaticClass.someStaticMethod() == "Philippines!"
    }
}

Here is another resource: https://github.com/jayway/powermock/wiki/powermockrule

like image 27
juanpaolo Avatar answered Nov 02 '22 07:11

juanpaolo