Context:
User
with public virtual ICollection<Topic> CreatedTopics
Navigation Property(Lazy Loading);Topic
with public virtual User Creator
Navigation Property;DataServiceController : DbDataController<DefaultDbContext>
, Web API beta, ASP.NET MVC 4 Beta , Single Page Application;Web API Action:
public IQueryable<Topic> GetTopics()
{
// return DbContext.Topics; // OK
return DbContext.Topics.Include("Creator"); //With Exception
}
Result: "an unhandled microsoft .net framework exception occurred in w3wp.exe"
The Problem here seems to be: I should not Add Navigation Property in both Entities(Cause Circular Reference?), and if I delete the CreatedTopics
Navigation Property in User
Class, It will be OK again.
So, In a similar Context like listed above, Here are my questions:
I Have read many related posts, but still not clear enough :(,
Thanks for any help!
Dean
A navigation property is an optional property on an entity type that allows for navigation from one end of an association to the other end. Unlike other properties, navigation properties do not carry data. A navigation property definition includes the following: A name.
Entity Framework Core allows you to use the navigation properties in your model to load related entities. There are three common O/RM patterns used to load related data. Eager loading means that the related data is loaded from the database as part of the initial query.
Navigation property: A property defined on the principal and/or dependent entity that references the related entity. Collection navigation property: A navigation property that contains references to many related entities.
Navigation properties provide a way to navigate an association between two entity types. Every object can have a navigation property for every relationship in which it participates.
This is not a problem of code first or EF - it is a problem of serialization. Simply the serializer used to convert your object graph to some representation passed in a Web API message is not able to work with circular references by default. Depending on the message format you want to use Web API uses different serializers by default - here is more about default serializers used by Web API and about the way how to change it. The following text suppose that you are using DataContractJsonSerializer
or DataContractSerializer
(should be default for XML serialization) but the same is possible for JSON.NET (should be default for JSON serialization - JSON serialization can be switched to DataContractJsonSerializer
but the default serializer is better).
So what you can do? You can tell the serializer that it should track those circular references by marking your classes with DataContract(IsReference = true)
and each passed property with DataMember
attribute (check the linked article for description how to achieve it with JSON.NET). This will allow serializer correctly recognizing cycles and the serialization will in theory succeed. In theory because this also demands to not using lazy loading. Otherwise you can serialize much more data than you expected (in some catastrophic scenarios it can lead to serializing whole content of your database).
When you serialize entity graph with lazy loading enabled you serailze a Topic
and its Creator
but serialization will also visit CreatedTopics
property => all related topics are lazy loaded and processed by serialization and serialization continues to visit Creator
of all newly loaded topics! This process continues until there is no other object to lazy load. Because of this you should never use lazy loading when serializing entities.
Other option is to exclude back reference from serialization. You just need to serialize Creator
. You don't need to serialize CreatedTopics
so you can mark the property with IgnoreDataMember
attribute (JsonIgnore
for JSON.NET). The problem is that if you also have Web API action for returning User
with all his CreateTopics
this will not work because of the attribute.
The last option is not using entities. This option is usually used in web services where you create special DTO objects satisfying requirements for specific operation and you handle conversion between entities and DTOs inside the operation (possible with help of some tool like AutoMapper).
There is no difference between handling one-to-one, one-to-many, or many-to-many relations. If you have navigation properties on both sides you must always deal with this problem.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With