Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Using Jest to mock a React component with props

I have a React component which contains some other components that depend on access to a Redux store etc., which cause issues when doing a full Enzyme mount. Let's say a structure like this:

import ComponentToMock from './ComponentToMock';  <ComponentToTest>   ...some stuff   <ComponentToMock testProp="This throws a warning" /> </ComponentToTest> 

I want to use Jest's .mock() method to mock out the sub-component, so that it is not a concern for the test.

I'm aware that I can mock out a straight component with something like:

jest.mock('./ComponentToMock', () => 'ComponentToMock');

However, as this component would normally receive props, React gets upset, giving a warning about unknown props (in this case, testProp) being passed to <ComponentToMock />.

I've tried to return a function instead, however you can't return JSX (from what I could tell) in a Jest mock, due to it being hoisted. It throws an error in this case.

So my question is how can I either

a) get ComponentToMock to ignore props passed to it, or

b) return a React component that can be used to mock the child component that I'm not worried about testing.

Or... is there a better way?

like image 452
Mike Hopkins Avatar asked Jun 07 '17 03:06

Mike Hopkins


People also ask

How do you mock a react component with props?

To mock a React component, the most straightforward approach is to use the jest. mock function. You mock the file that exports the component and replace it with a custom implementation. Since a component is basically a function, the mock should also return a function.

How do you mock an element in Jest?

You can use it like this: imoprt { activeListItem } from './utils'; let spy; beforeAll(() => { spy = jest. spyOn(document, 'getElementById'); }); describe('activeListItem', () => { describe('with found element', () => { let mockElement; beforeAll(() => { // here you create the element that the document.

How would you test the react components using Jest and enzymes?

Both Jest and Enzyme are meant to test the react applications. Jest can be used with any other Javascript framework, but Enzyme is meant to run on react only. Jest can be used without Enzyme, and snapshots can be created and tested perfectly fine. But the Enzyme adds additional functionality to it.


2 Answers

There's a note at the bottom of the docs for jest.mock() for preventing the hoisting behavior:

Note: When using babel-jest, calls to mock will automatically be hoisted to the top of the code block. Use doMock if you want to explicitly avoid this behavior.

Then you can do as you described: return a function that is a stub of the component you don't need to test.

jest.doMock('./ComponentToMock', () => {   const ComponentToMock = () => <div />;   return ComponentToMock; });  const ComponentToTest = require('./ComponentToTest').default; 

It's helpful to name the stub component since it gets rendered in snapshots.

like image 124
Mike Reifman Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 10:10

Mike Reifman


I've learned a little more since I asked this question. Here's an alternative (better?) way of dealing with mocking components that need to be passed props: using module mock files.

First create a file with the same name as the component to mock in a __mocks__ folder under the component's folder e.g.

. |- /ComponentToMock.js └- /__mocks__/ComponentToMock.js <-- create this folder/file! 

Note: It seems as of the time of writing, the folder must be called __mocks__ (you will need to create __mocks__ in each folder you need to mock components for. If the underscores upset you, just pretend they aren't there ;) )

Next, in this mock file, you can write the file as you wish, e.g.

// This code would live in ./__mocks__/ComponentToMock.js import React from 'react'; const ComponentToMock = ({ testProp }) => <div>A mock with '{testProp}' passed!</div>; export default ComponentToMock; 

Then in the test file, change the Jest mock statement to: jest.mock('./ComponentToMock');

When Jest encounters a .mock() without the second function parameter, it automatically looks for a __mocks__ folder. However, even though the mock statement gets hoisted in the component being tested, this doesn't affect the imports of the mock itself - hence why it's able to import and compile a React component!

This seems to work well for mocked components that need to be passed props, and would otherwise produce prop warnings if a nulled function was returned (but which is perfectly acceptable to continue using if the component does not receive props). I hope this helps some people out there.

like image 27
Mike Hopkins Avatar answered Oct 06 '22 11:10

Mike Hopkins