Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Using IPython / Jupyter Notebooks Under Version Control

What is a good strategy for keeping IPython notebooks under version control?

The notebook format is quite amenable for version control: if one wants to version control the notebook and the outputs then this works quite well. The annoyance comes when one wants only to version control the input, excluding the cell outputs (aka. "build products") which can be large binary blobs, especially for movies and plots. In particular, I am trying to find a good workflow that:

  • allows me to choose between including or excluding output,
  • prevents me from accidentally committing output if I do not want it,
  • allows me to keep output in my local version,
  • allows me to see when I have changes in the inputs using my version control system (i.e. if I only version control the inputs but my local file has outputs, then I would like to be able to see if the inputs have changed (requiring a commit). Using the version control status command will always register a difference since the local file has outputs.)
  • allows me to update my working notebook (which contains the output) from an updated clean notebook. (update)

As mentioned, if I chose to include the outputs (which is desirable when using nbviewer for example), then everything is fine. The problem is when I do not want to version control the output. There are some tools and scripts for stripping the output of the notebook, but frequently I encounter the following issues:

  1. I accidentally commit a version with the the output, thereby polluting my repository.
  2. I clear output to use version control, but would really rather keep the output in my local copy (sometimes it takes a while to reproduce for example).
  3. Some of the scripts that strip output change the format slightly compared to the Cell/All Output/Clear menu option, thereby creating unwanted noise in the diffs. This is resolved by some of the answers.
  4. When pulling changes to a clean version of the file, I need to find some way of incorporating those changes in my working notebook without having to rerun everything. (update)

I have considered several options that I shall discuss below, but have yet to find a good comprehensive solution. A full solution might require some changes to IPython, or may rely on some simple external scripts. I currently use mercurial, but would like a solution that also works with git: an ideal solution would be version-control agnostic.

This issue has been discussed many times, but there is no definitive or clear solution from the user's perspective. The answer to this question should provide the definitive strategy. It is fine if it requires a recent (even development) version of IPython or an easily installed extension.

Update: I have been playing with my modified notebook version which optionally saves a .clean version with every save using Gregory Crosswhite's suggestions. This satisfies most of my constraints but leaves the following unresolved:

  1. This is not yet a standard solution (requires a modification of the ipython source. Is there a way of achieving this behaviour with a simple extension? Needs some sort of on-save hook.
  2. A problem I have with the current workflow is pulling changes. These will come in to the .clean file, and then need to be integrated somehow into my working version. (Of course, I can always re-execute the notebook, but this can be a pain, especially if some of the results depend on long calculations, parallel computations, etc.) I do not have a good idea about how to resolve this yet. Perhaps a workflow involving an extension like ipycache might work, but that seems a little too complicated.

Notes

Removing (stripping) Output

  • When the notebook is running, one can use the Cell/All Output/Clear menu option for removing the output.
  • There are some scripts for removing output, such as the script nbstripout.py which remove the output, but does not produce the same output as using the notebook interface. This was eventually included in the ipython/nbconvert repo, but this has been closed stating that the changes are now included in ipython/ipython,but the corresponding functionality seems not to have been included yet. (update) That being said, Gregory Crosswhite's solution shows that this is pretty easy to do, even without invoking ipython/nbconvert, so this approach is probably workable if it can be properly hooked in. (Attaching it to each version control system, however, does not seem like a good idea — this should somehow hook in to the notebook mechanism.)

Newsgroups

  • Thoughts on the notebook format for version control.

Issues

  • 977: Notebook feature requests (Open).
  • 1280: Clear-all on save option (Open). (Follows from this discussion.)
  • 3295: autoexported notebooks: only export explicitly marked cells (Closed). Resolved by extension 11 Add writeandexecute magic (Merged).

Pull Requests

  • 1621: clear In[] prompt numbers on "Clear All Output" (Merged). (See also 2519 (Merged).)
  • 1563: clear_output improvements (Merged).
  • 3065: diff-ability of notebooks (Closed).
  • 3291: Add the option to skip output cells when saving. (Closed). This seems extremely relevant, however was closed with the suggestion to use a "clean/smudge" filter. A relevant question what can you use if you want to strip off output before running git diff? seems not to have been answered.
  • 3312: WIP: Notebook save hooks (Closed).
  • 3747: ipynb -> ipynb transformer (Closed). This is rebased in 4175.
  • 4175: nbconvert: Jinjaless exporter base (Merged).
  • 142: Use STDIN in nbstripout if no input is given (Open).
like image 598
mforbes Avatar asked Sep 11 '13 07:09

mforbes


People also ask

How do you use version control in Jupyter Notebook?

Version Control the Python ScriptAdd the . py file to version control. Every saved change to a Python cell in this Jupyter notebook will now be reflected in the . py file.

Does Jupyter have version control?

Version control, also known as source code control, is used to track changes in code and other artifacts in software development and data science work.

Do I need IPython for Jupyter?

The IPython kernel is the Python execution backend for Jupyter. The Jupyter Notebook and other frontends automatically ensure that the IPython kernel is available. However, if you want to use a kernel with a different version of Python, or in a virtualenv or conda environment, you'll need to install that manually.

Is IPython notebook and Jupyter Notebook same?

Jupyter Notebook (formerly IPython Notebook) is a web-based interactive computational environment for creating, executing, and visualizing Jupyter notebooks.


1 Answers

Here is my solution with git. It allows you to just add and commit (and diff) as usual: those operations will not alter your working tree, and at the same time (re)running a notebook will not alter your git history.

Although this can probably be adapted to other VCSs, I know it doesn't satisfy your requirements (at least the VSC agnosticity). Still, it is perfect for me, and although it's nothing particularly brilliant, and many people probably already use it, I didn't find clear instructions about how to implement it by googling around. So it may be useful to other people.

  1. Save a file with this content somewhere (for the following, let us assume ~/bin/ipynb_output_filter.py)

  2. Make it executable (chmod +x ~/bin/ipynb_output_filter.py)

  3. Create the file ~/.gitattributes, with the following content

    *.ipynb filter=dropoutput_ipynb

  4. Run the following commands:

    git config --global core.attributesfile ~/.gitattributes git config --global filter.dropoutput_ipynb.clean ~/bin/ipynb_output_filter.py git config --global filter.dropoutput_ipynb.smudge cat

Done!

Limitations:

  • it works only with git
  • in git, if you are in branch somebranch and you do git checkout otherbranch; git checkout somebranch, you usually expect the working tree to be unchanged. Here instead you will have lost the output and cells numbering of notebooks whose source differs between the two branches.
  • more in general, the output is not versioned at all, as with Gregory's solution. In order to not just throw it away every time you do anything involving a checkout, the approach could be changed by storing it in separate files (but notice that at the time the above code is run, the commit id is not known!), and possibly versioning them (but notice this would require something more than a git commit notebook_file.ipynb, although it would at least keep git diff notebook_file.ipynb free from base64 garbage).
  • that said, incidentally if you do pull code (i.e. committed by someone else not using this approach) which contains some output, the output is checked out normally. Only the locally produced output is lost.

My solution reflects the fact that I personally don't like to keep generated stuff versioned - notice that doing merges involving the output is almost guaranteed to invalidate the output or your productivity or both.

EDIT:

  • if you do adopt the solution as I suggested it - that is, globally - you will have trouble in case for some git repo you want to version output. So if you want to disable the output filtering for a specific git repository, simply create inside it a file .git/info/attributes, with

    **.ipynb filter=

as content. Clearly, in the same way it is possible to do the opposite: enable the filtering only for a specific repository.

  • the code is now maintained in its own git repo

  • if the instructions above result in ImportErrors, try adding "ipython" before the path of the script:

      git config --global filter.dropoutput_ipynb.clean ipython ~/bin/ipynb_output_filter.py 

EDIT: May 2016 (updated February 2017): there are several alternatives to my script - for completeness, here is a list of those I know: nbstripout (other variants), nbstrip, jq.

like image 125
Pietro Battiston Avatar answered Oct 05 '22 18:10

Pietro Battiston