Does anybody experience mixing -g (debugging symbols) and -O2 (best safe optimization) with gcc compiler?
I have to debug crashes of a release program distributed to final users that could send me back the core file.
I've always used to call:
gdb << myprogram >> << core file >>
and see where the trouble is. Now I can just see the call-trace but having no debugging symbols I'm quite in trouble.
Any idea?
It works fine.
Or well, due to the optimization sometimes the source you're stepping through with the debugger doesn't match up exactly with the source, but IMHO despite this having the debug symbols makes debugging much easier.
We use both together in production environment, which makes debugging a lot easier if the customer have only seen a crash once. It gives you a pretty good idea where the problem is (not if it was a memory corruption).
In theory adding -g shouldn't really affect the performance, although the executable gets large. In embedded environment it is a big trade-off.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With