import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import fsolve
musun = 132712000000
T = 365.25 * 86400 * 2 / 3
e = 581.2392124070273
def f(x):
return ((T * musun ** 2 / (2 * np.pi)) ** (1 / 3) * np.sqrt(1 - x ** 2)
- np.sqrt(.5 * musun ** 2 / e * (1 - x ** 2)))
x = fsolve(f, 0.01)
f(x)
print x
What is wrong with this code? It seems to not work.
fsolve tries to solve the components of function f simultaneously and uses the Gauss-Newton method with numerical gradient and Jacobian.
fsolve finds a root (zero) of a system of nonlinear equations. x = fsolve(fun,x0) starts at x0 and tries to solve the equations described in fun . x = fsolve(fun,x0,options) minimizes with the optimization parameters specified in the structure options . Use optimset to set these parameters.
Find the roots of a function. Return the roots of the (non-linear) equations defined by func(x) = 0 given a starting estimate. A function that takes at least one (possibly vector) argument, and returns a value of the same length.
fsolve uses an iterative algorithm, with the initialised variables as the starting point for the iteration. See the help for fsolve (under options) to see what iterative methods you can choose.
Because sqrt
returns NaN for nagative argument, you function f(x) is not calculatable for all real x. I change your function to use numpy.emath.sqrt()
which can output complex values when the argument < 0, and returns the absolute value of the expression.
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import fsolve
sqrt = np.emath.sqrt
musun = 132712000000
T = 365.25 * 86400 * 2 / 3
e = 581.2392124070273
def f(x):
return np.abs((T * musun ** 2 / (2 * np.pi)) ** (1 / 3) * sqrt(1 - x ** 2)
- sqrt(.5 * musun ** 2 / e * (1 - x ** 2)))
x = fsolve(f, 0.01)
x, f(x)
Then you can get the right result:
(array([ 1.]), array([ 121341.22302275]))
the solution is very close to the true root, but f(x) is still very large, because f(x) has a very large factor: musun.
fsolve()
returns the roots of f(x) = 0
(see here).
When I plotted the values of f(x)
for x
in the range -1 to 1, I found that there are roots at x = -1
and x = 1
. However, if x > 1
or x < -1
, both of the sqrt()
functions will be passed a negative argument, which causes the error invalid value encountered in sqrt
.
It doesn't surprise me that fsolve()
fails to find roots that are at the very ends of the valid range for the function.
I find that it is always a good idea to plot the graph of a function before trying to find its roots, as that can indicate how likely (or in this case, unlikely) it is that the roots will be found by any root-finding algorithm.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With