Hi is there a way to do things like this:
for (int i = 0; i < Math.Min(a.Count, b.Count); i++) { // Do stuff //a[i] //b[i] }
with Foreach?
because it would be nice to write something like
foreach(var item1 in list1 and var item2 in list2 /* ....*/) { item1.use(item2); }
ok sorry i wasn't clear enough for some people so here am hopefully better explanation
List<classA> listA = fillListA(); List<classB> listB = fillListB(); //here could be infinity many lists of sometimes diffrent T types
Now i want to perform some sort of ForEach because i dont like to do it with a for loop it should be simple and clear well something like
foreach(var item1 in list1 and var item2 in list2 /* and ...*/) { item1.use(item2); }
AFAIK i cant modifie such a keay word class thing so i thought ok build the iterator like Parallel.ForEach did ForEach<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>, Action<TSource>)
but her i get stucked because i don't know how implement it
Static.ForEach<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>,IEnumerable<TSource>, ???Action<TSource,???>????)
You can do what foreach
does under the hood, but with two enumerators:
using(var e1 = list1.GetEnumerator()) using(var e2 = list2.GetEnumerator()) { while(e1.MoveNext() && e2.MoveNext()) { var item1 = e1.Current; var item2 = e2.Current; // use item1 and item2 } }
For convenience, you can write an extension method like the following that takes an action:
public static void ZipDo<T1, T2>( this IEnumerable<T1> first, IEnumerable<T2> second, Action<T1, T2> action) { using (var e1 = first.GetEnumerator()) using (var e2 = second.GetEnumerator()) { while (e1.MoveNext() && e2.MoveNext()) { action(e1.Current, e2.Current); } } }
and use it like:
list1.ZipDo(list2, (i1,i2) => i1.Use(i2));
By the way, you can expand this to use 3 or more lists:
public static void ZipDo<T1, T2, T3>(this IEnumerable<T1> first, IEnumerable<T2> second, IEnumerable<T3> third, Action<T1, T2, T3> action) { using (var e1 = first.GetEnumerator()) using (var e2 = second.GetEnumerator()) using (var e3 = third.GetEnumerator()) { while (e1.MoveNext() && e2.MoveNext() && e3.MoveNext()) { action(e1.Current, e2.Current, e3.Current); } } }
The approach above is required when the collections have different generic types. However, if they all have the same generic type, then you can write a flexible method that takes any number of IEnumerable<T>
s:
public static void ZipAll<T>(this IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T>> all, Action<IEnumerable<T>> action) { var enumerators = all.Select(e => e.GetEnumerator()).ToList(); try { while (enumerators.All(e => e.MoveNext())) action(enumerators.Select(e => e.Current)); } finally { foreach (var e in enumerators) e.Dispose(); } }
and use it:
var lists = new[] { new[]{ 1, 1, 1 }, new[]{ 2, 2, 2 }, new[]{ 3, 3, 3 }}; lists.ZipAll(nums => Console.WriteLine(nums.Sum())); // 6 // 6 // 6
The only thing I can think of that comes close is Enumerable.Zip
along with tuples:
foreach(var tuple in list1.Zip(list2, Tuple.Create)) { tuple.Item1.use(tuple.Item2); }
Of course, if instead of use
, we had a non side-effecting method that produced a third value from the two elements, you could do:
var result = list1.Zip(list2, (item1, item2) => item1.ProduceObject(item2)) .ToList(); // if required
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With