Why Cant I do something like this?
If I have a List<String> myList
populated with items, I want to be able to act on each member in a conditional way like so:
myList.ForEach(a => { if (a.Trim().Length == 0) a = "0.0"; })
But this will not compile. Im guessing its something to do with missing a return value?
Im trying to prepare a list of strings for conversion to doubles, and I want the empty items to show '0.0' so I can just convert the whole list in one go.
ForEach is not mutable, it doesn't change the data structure in any way.
You can either:
Example of #1:
for (Int32 index = 0; index < myList.Count; index++)
if (myList[index].Trim().Length == 0)
myList[index] = "0.0";
With .NET 3.5 and Linq:
myList = (from a in myList
select (a.Trim().Length == 0) ? "0.0" : a).ToList();
With .NET 3.5, not using the Linq-syntax, but using the Linq-code:
myList = myList.Select(a => (a.Trim().Length == 0) ? "0.0" : a).ToList();
Edit: If you want to produce a new list of doubles, you can also do that in one go using Linq:
List<Double> myDoubleList =
(from a in myList
select (a.Trim().Length == 0 ? "0" : a) into d
select Double.Parse(d)).ToList();
Note that using "0.0" instead of just "0" relies on the decimal point being the full stop character. On my system it isn't, so I replaced it with just "0", but a more appropriate way would be to change the call to Double.Parse to take an explicit numeric formatting, like this:
List<Double> myDoubleList =
(from a in myList
select (a.Trim().Length == 0 ? "0.0" : a) into d
select Double.Parse(d, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)).ToList();
What you possibly want is:
public static void MutateEach(this IList<T> list, Func<T, T> mutator)
{
int count = list.Count;
for (int n = 0; n < count; n++)
list[n] = mutator(list[n]);
}
Which would allow:
myList.MutateEach(a => (a.Trim().Length == 0) ? "0.0" : a);
Just put the MutateEach
method in a public static class of your own and make sure you have a using directive that will find it.
Whether it's worth defining something like this depends on how often you'd use it. Note that it has to be an extension on IList
instead of IEnumerable
, so we can perform the updates, which makes it less widely applicable.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With