Consider the following (based on the default MVC template), which is a simplified version of some "stuff" that happens in the background - it completes fine, and shows the expected result, 20:
public ActionResult Index()
{
var task = SlowDouble(10);
string result;
if (task.Wait(2000))
{
result = task.Result.ToString();
}
else
{
result = "timeout";
}
ViewBag.Message = result;
return View();
}
internal static Task<long> SlowDouble(long val)
{
TaskCompletionSource<long> result = new TaskCompletionSource<long>();
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(delegate
{
Thread.Sleep(50);
result.SetResult(val * 2);
});
return result.Task;
}
However, now if we add some async
into the mix:
public static async Task<long> IndirectSlowDouble(long val)
{
long result = await SlowDouble(val);
return result;
}
and change the first line in the route to:
var task = IndirectSlowDouble(10);
then it does not work; it times out instead. If we add breakpoints, the return result;
in the async
method only happens after the route has already completed - basically, it looks like the system is unwilling to use any thread to resume the async
operation until after the request has finished. Worse: if we had used .Wait()
(or accessed .Result
), then it will totally deadlock.
So: what is with that? The obvious workaround is "don't involve async
", but that is not easy when consuming libraries etc. Ultimately, there is no functional difference between SlowDouble
and IndirectSlowDouble
(although there is obvious a structural difference).
Note: the exact same thing in a console / winform / etc will work fine.
The asynchronous controller enables you to write asynchronous action methods. It allows you to perform long running operation(s) without making the running thread idle. It does not mean it will take lesser time to complete the action.
async actions help best when the actions does some I\O operations to DB or some network bound calls where the thread that processes the request will be stalled before it gets answer from the DB or network bound call which you just invoked.
The Route Constraint in ASP.NET MVC Routing allows us to apply a regular expression to a URL segment to restrict whether the route will match the request. In simple words, we can say that the Route constraint is a way to put some validation around the defined route.
The default route table contains a single route (named Default). The Default route maps the first segment of a URL to a controller name, the second segment of a URL to a controller action, and the third segment to a parameter named id.
It's to do with the way the synchronization context is implemented in ASP.NET (Pre .NET 4.5). There's tons of questions about this behavior:
Task.WaitAll hanging with multiple awaitable tasks in ASP.NET
Asp.net SynchronizationContext locks HttpApplication for async continuations?
In ASP.NET 4.5, there's a new implementation of the sync context that's described in this article.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/webdev/archive/2012/11/19/all-about-httpruntime-targetframework.aspx
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With