If you want to update data and cause a UI update, useState is your Hook. If you need some kind of data container throughout the component's lifecycle without causing render cycles on mutating your variable, then useRef is your solution.
Refs are a function provided by React to access the DOM element and the React element that you might have created on your own. They are used in cases where we want to change the value of a child component, without making use of props and all.
In order to get a reference to a React component, you can either use this to get the current React component, or you can use a ref to get a reference to a component you own. They work like this: var MyComponent = React. createClass({ handleClick: function() { // Explicitly focus the text input using the raw DOM API.
In react, there is another way to use refs that is called "callback refs" and it gives more control when the refs are set and unset. Instead of creating refs by createRef() method, React allows a way to create refs by passing a callback function to the ref attribute of a component.
The short version: avoid refs.
They're bad for maintainability, and lose a lot of the simplicity of the WYSIWYG model render provides.
You have a form. You need to add a button that resets the form.
You have an CCV number field in an input and some other fields in your application that are numbers. Now you need to enforce the user only enters numbers.
Eh, nevermind, the PM wants us to just do a red box-shadow if it's invalid.
We need to give control back to the parent. The data is now in props and we need to react to changes.
sed -e 's/this.state/this.props/' 's/handleChange/onChange/' -i form.js
People think refs are 'easier' than keeping it in state. This may be true for the first 20 minutes, it's not true in my experience after that. Put your self in a position to say "Yeah, I'll have it done in 5 minutes" rather than "Sure, I'll just rewrite a few components".
I've seen a few people cite the above answer as a reason to "never use refs" and I want to give my (as well as a few other React devs I've spoken to) opinion.
The "don't use refs" sentiment is correct when talking about using them for component instances. Meaning, you shouldn't use refs as a way to grab component instances and call methods on them. This is the incorrect way to use refs and is when refs go south quickly.
The correct (and very useful) way to use refs is when you're using them to get some value from the DOM. For example, if you have an input field attaching a ref to that input then grabbing the value later through the ref is just fine. Without this way, you need to go through a fairly orchestrated process for keeping your input field up to date with either your local state or your flux store - which seems unnecessary.
2019 edit: Hello friends of the future. In addition to what I mentioned a few years ago ^, with React Hooks, refs are also a great way to keep track of data between renders and aren't limited to just grabbing DOM nodes.
This post is old.
I will share my little experience on one case on that matter.
I was working on a big component (414 lines) with a lot of 'dynamic' inputs and lots of cached data involved. (I am not working alone on the page, and my senses tell me that the structure of the code probably could be splitted better, but it's not the point (well, it could be but I am dealing with it)
I first worked with state to handle the values of the inputs:
const [inputsValues, setInputsValues] = useState([])
const setInputValue = (id, value) => {
const arr = [...inputsValues]
arr[id] = value
setInputsValues(arr)
}
and of course in the inputs:
value={inputsValues[id] || ''}
onChange={event => setInputValue(id, event.target.value)}
Rendering was so heavy that the input change was choppy as **** (don't try to keep the key down, text would only appear after a pause)
I was sure I could avoid this using refs.
ended up like this :
const inputsRef = useRef([])
and in the inputs :
ref={input => (inputsRef.current[id] = input)}
[ well in My case Input was Material-UI TextField so it was:
inputRef={input => (inputsRef.current[id] = input)}
]
Thanks to this, there is no rerendering, the input is smooth, funcionality works the same way. It will save cycles and calculation, so energy too. Do it for earth x)
My conclusion : useRef for inputs value can even be be needed.
TL;DR Generally speaking, refs
go against React's declarative philosophy, so you should use them as a last resort. Use state / props
whenever possible.
To understand where yo use refs
vs state / props
, let's look at some of the design principles that React follows.
Per React documentation about refs
Avoid using refs for anything that can be done declaratively.
Per React's Design Principles about Escape Hatches
If some pattern that is useful for building apps is hard to express in a declarative way, we will provide an imperative API for it. (and they link to refs here)
Which means React's team suggest to avoid refs
and use state / props
for anything that can be done in a reactive / declarative way.
@Tyler McGinnis has provided a very good answer, stating as well that
The correct (and very useful) way to use refs is when you're using them to get some value from the DOM...
While you can do that, you'll be working against React's philosophy. If you have value in an input, it most certainly comes from state / props
. To keep code consistent and predictable, you should stick to state / props
there as well. I acknowledge the fact that refs
sometimes gives you the quicker solution, so if you do a proof of concept, quick and dirty is acceptable.
This leaves us with several concrete use cases for refs
Managing focus, text selection, or media playback. Triggering imperative animations. Integrating with third-party DOM libraries.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With