I'm having some trouble with constexpr. The book C++ Primer shows a line of code:
  constexpr int sz = size(); // only size() is a constexpr function                              // this code is right   However the book doesn't give a specific example. So I try the following code by myself:
#include <iostream> constexpr int fun(); int main() {     constexpr int f = fun();     std::cout << f << std::endl; } constexpr int fun() {     return 3; }   But my compiler said fun() is undefined.
If I change constexpr into const, it works well, and if I change my code to define the constexpr function before use:
#include <iostream> constexpr int fun() {     return 3; } int main() {     constexpr int f = fun();     std::cout << f << std::endl; }   It also works well. Can someone tell me why?
constexpr functions A constexpr function is one whose return value is computable at compile time when consuming code requires it. Consuming code requires the return value at compile time to initialize a constexpr variable, or to provide a non-type template argument.
#define directives create macro substitution, while constexpr variables are special type of variables. They literally have nothing in common beside the fact that before constexpr (or even const ) variables were available, macros were sometimes used when currently constexpr variable can be used.
Yes. I believe putting such const ness is always a good practice wherever you can. For example in your class if a given method is not modifying any member then you always tend to put a const keyword in the end.
constexpr functions will be evaluated at compile time when all its arguments are constant expressions and the result is used in a constant expression as well.
A constexpr function does NOT have to be defined before its first use, however the result of any call made prior to definition is not a constant expression.
Source: C++ Standard draft n4296, section 5.20:
A conditional-expression
eis a core constant expression unless the evaluation ofe, following the rules of the abstract machine, would evaluate one of the following expressions:
this, except in aconstexprfunction or aconstexprconstructor that is being evaluated as part ofe;- an invocation of a function other than a
 constexprconstructor for a literal class, aconstexprfunction, or an implicit invocation of a trivial destructor [ Note: Overload resolution is applied as usual — end note ];- an invocation of an undefined
 constexprfunction or an undefinedconstexprconstructor;- ...
 
version from draft 3485 (section 5.19):
A conditional-expression is a core constant expression unless it involves one of the following as a potentially evaluated subexpression, but subexpressions of logical AND, logical OR, and conditional operations that are not evaluated are not considered [ Note: An overloaded operator invokes a function. — end note ]:
this[ Note: when evaluating a constant expression, function invocation substitution replaces each occurrence ofthisin aconstexprmember function with a pointer to the class object. — end note ];- an invocation of a function other than a
 constexprconstructor for a literal class or aconstexprfunction [ Note: Overload resolution is applied as usual — end note ];- an invocation of an undefined
 constexprfunction or an undefinedconstexprconstructor- ...
 
The example int x2 = s. t(); in n2235 actually became valid due to the changes made prior to Standardization.  However, constexpr int x2 = s. t(); remains an error.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With