Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Use linq to generate direct update without select

Tags:

c#

.net

sql

linq

G'day everyone.

I'm still learning LINQ so forgive me if this is naive. When you're dealing with SQL directly, you can generate update commands with conditionals, without running a select statement.

When I work with linq I seem to follow the pattern of:

  1. Select entities
  2. Modify entities
  3. Submit changes

What I want to do is a direct update using linq and deferred execution. Is it possible that the actual execution occurs directly at the SQL without any data being transmitted up to the client?

DataContext dc = new DataContext  var q = from product in dc.Products         where product.Type = 1         set product.Count = 0  dc.SubmitChanges 

So in essence LINQ has all the information it needs WITHOUT using a select to generate an update command. It would run the SQL:

Update Products Set Count = 0 Where Type = 1 

Does a keyword like "set" exist in LINQ?

like image 283
Spence Avatar asked Jan 14 '09 22:01

Spence


1 Answers

You can actually let LINQ-to-SQL generate update statements:

Foo foo=new Foo { FooId=fooId }; // create obj and set keys context.Foos.Attach(foo); foo.Name="test"; context.SubmitChanges(); 

In your Dbml set UpdateCheck="Never" for all properties.

This will generate a single update statement without having to do a select first.

One caveat: if you want to be able to set Name to null you would have to initialize your foo object to a different value so Linq can detect the change:

Foo foo=new Foo { FooId=fooId, Name="###" }; ... foo.Name=null; 

If you want to check for a timestamp while updating you can do this as well:

Foo foo=new Foo { FooId=fooId, Modified=... };  // Modified needs to be set to UpdateCheck="Always" in the dbml 
like image 114
laktak Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 08:10

laktak