I'm implementing iterator through continuous chunk of memory and came to the issue about its conforming usage. My current implementation (assuming I'm iterating through array of char
s).
typedef struct iterator{
void *next_ptr;
void *limit; //one past last element pointer
} iterator_t;
void *next(iterator_t *iterator_ptr){
void *limit = iterator_ptr -> limit;
void *next_ptr = iterator_ptr -> next_ptr;
ptrdiff_t diff = limit - next_ptr;
if(diff <= 0){
return NULL;
}
iterator_ptr -> next_ptr = ((char *) next_ptr) + 1;
return next_ptr;
}
The issue is the Standard claims at 6.5.6(p9)
that:
When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same array object,or one past the last element of the array object
This is true. I assume the area I'm iterating through is an array.
If the result is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is undefined. In other words, if the expressions point to, respectively, the
i
-th andj
-th elements of an array object, the expression(P)-(Q)
has the valuei−j
provided the value fits in an object of typeptrdiff_t
.
The limits of ptrdiff_t
are defined at 7.20.3(p2)
:
limits of
ptrdiff_t
PTRDIFF_MIN
−65535
PTRDIFF_MAX
+65535
There is no any guarantees that all values represented with size_t
should be represented with ptrdiff_t
.
So we judging by the limits we can conformingly subtract pointers of an array only of 65535
elements at most? So this would not work in general case where I want to subtract two pointers to elements of an array of unknown size?
ptrdiff_t type is a base signed integer type of C/C++ language. The type's size is chosen so that it can store the maximum size of a theoretically possible array of any type.
uintptr_t is an unsigned integer type that is capable of storing a data pointer (whether it can hold a function pointer is unspecified). Which typically means that it's the same size as a pointer. It is optionally defined in C++11 and later standards.
Pointer arithmetic. The C++ language allows you to perform integer addition or subtraction operations on pointers. If ptr points to an integer, ptr + 1 is the address of the next integer in memory after ptr. ptr - 1 is the address of the previous integer before ptr .
The size of size_t and ptrdiff_t always coincide with the pointer's size. Because of this, it is these types that should be used as indexes for large arrays, for storage of pointers and pointer arithmetic.
From the specification (section 7.20.3)
Its implementation-defined value shall be equal to or greater in magnitude (absolute value) than the corresponding value given below
[Emphasis mine]
So the values mentioned are only minimum values. The implementation could have larger limits. I would expect ptrdiff_t
to be the word-length of the target platform (i.e. a 64-bit type of 64-bit systems).
And note that size_t
is an unsigned integer type, while ptrdiff_t
is a signed integer type. That kind of implies that not all values of a size_t
could be represented by a ptrdiff_t
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With