Unresolved class name proguard-rules Android Studio 4.0

Question

When I update to Android Studio 4.0 proguard-rules it shows warning Unresolved class name. Below is example but I sure it still waring the exist class in my project.

-keep class com.squareup.haha.** { *; }
-keep class com.squareup.leakcanary.** { *; }

If I change from ** to * this warning is gone.

-keep class com.squareup.haha.* { *; }
-keep class com.squareup.leakcanary.* { *; }

Does anyone get this? Should I ignore this warning or it's bug of Android Studio 4.0?

Update

I find it's bug, it already assigned but not resolved https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/153616200

Update July

Google team already analysis and increase priory of this bug, it may be related to a newer version of R8.

Update August

Fixed in AS 4.2 Canary 9

Answer 1

Check this issue: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/147802433

`If you right-click on error, there is option "suppress for statement", after that AS adds a comment such as:

noinspection ShrinkerUnresolvedReference

-keep class not.existing

And with this comment there is no error for "not.existing".`

Answer 2

Replace .** with ** as workaround. No compile error and classes are kept.

-keep class com.squareup.haha** { *; }
-keep class com.squareup.leakcanary** { *; }

Answer 3

This issue is fixed in Android Studio 4.2 Canary 8. Please find the release notes here https://androidstudio.googleblog.com/2020/08/android-studio-42-canary-8-available.html and check for this issue id #153616200

Answer 4

A folder and its subfile. I have tested this:

com.xx.xx.* { *; }   

I guess that it may contain multiply folders and subfile. I've not tested this:

com.xx.xx.**.* {*;}   

Answer 5

All of these answers are mere non-sense because:

LeakCanary is being added as debugImplementation.

• it makes no sense to have rules for classes which do not exist in release builds.
• it makes even less sense to obfuscate debug builds.

In case you may require any of these rules, you've added it to the wrong build-type.