Reading the documentation for text feature extraction in scikit-learn, I am not sure how the different arguments available for TfidfVectorizer (and may be other vectorizers) affect the outcome.
Here are the arguments I am not sure how they work:
TfidfVectorizer(stop_words='english', ngram_range=(1, 2), max_df=0.5, min_df=20, use_idf=True)
The documentation is clear on the use of stop_words/ max_df (both have similar effect and may be one can be used instead of the other). However, I am not sure if these options should be used together with ngrams. Which one occurs/handled first, ngrams or stop_words? why? Based on my experiment, stop words are removed first, but the purpose of ngrams is to extract phrases, etc. I am not sure about the effect of this sequence (Stops removed and then ngramed).
Second, does it make sense to use max_df/min_df arguments together with use_idf argument? aren't the purpose of these similar?
TfidfVectorizer - Transforms text to feature vectors that can be used as input to estimator. vocabulary_ Is a dictionary that converts each token (word) to feature index in the matrix, each unique token gets a feature index.
TF-IDF is one of the most commonly used weighting metrics for measuring the relationship of words to documents. It is widely used for word feature extraction. In many research and applications, the thresholds of TF-IDF for selecting relevant words are only based on trial or experiences.
In order to address this, scikit-learn provides utilities for the most common ways to extract numerical features from text content, namely: tokenizing strings and giving an integer id for each possible token, for instance by using white-spaces and punctuation as token separators.
I see several questions in this post.
- How do the different arguments in TfidfVectorizer interact with one another?
You really have to use it quite a bit to develop a sense of intuition (has been my experience anyway).
TfidfVectorizer is a bag of words approach. In NLP, sequences of words and their window is important; this kind of destroys some of that context.
How do I control what tokens get outputted?
Set ngram_range
to (1,1) for outputting only one-word tokens, (1,2) for one-word and two-word tokens, (2, 3) for two-word and three-word tokens, etc.
ngram_range
works hand-in-hand with analyzer
. Set analyzer
to "word" for outputting words and phrases, or set it to "char" to output character ngrams.
If you want your output to have both "word" and "char" features, use sklearn's FeatureUnion. Example here.
How do I remove unwanted stuff?
Use stop_words
to remove less-meaningful english words.
The list of stop words that sklearn uses can be found at:
from sklearn.feature_extraction.stop_words import ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS
The logic of removing stop words has to do with the fact that these words don't carry a lot of meaning, and they appear a lot in most text:
[('the', 79808),
('of', 40024),
('and', 38311),
('to', 28765),
('in', 22020),
('a', 21124),
('that', 12512),
('he', 12401),
('was', 11410),
('it', 10681),
('his', 10034),
('is', 9773),
('with', 9739),
('as', 8064),
('i', 7679),
('had', 7383),
('for', 6938),
('at', 6789),
('by', 6735),
('on', 6639)]
Since stop words generally have a high frequency, it might make sense to use max_df
as a float of say 0.95 to remove the top 5% but then you're assuming that the top 5% is all stop words which might not be the case. It really depends on your text data. In my line of work, it's very common that the top words or phrases are NOT stop words because I work with dense text (search query data) in very specific topics.
Use min_df
as an integer to remove rare-occurring words. If they only occur once or twice, they won't add much value and are usually really obscure. Furthermore, there's generally a lot of them so ignoring them with say min_df=5
can greatly reduce your memory consumption and data size.
How do I Include stuff that's being stripped out?
token_pattern
uses a regex pattern \b\w\w+\b
which means that tokens have to be at least 2 characters long so words like "I", "a" are removed and also numbers like 0 - 9 are removed. You'll also notice it removes apostrophes
- What happens first, ngram generation or stop word removal?
Let's do a little test.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer, CountVectorizer
from sklearn.feature_extraction.stop_words import ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS
docs = np.array(['what is tfidf',
'what does tfidf stand for',
'what is tfidf and what does it stand for',
'tfidf is what',
"why don't I use tfidf",
'1 in 10 people use tfidf'])
tfidf = TfidfVectorizer(use_idf=False, norm=None, ngram_range=(1, 1))
matrix = tfidf.fit_transform(docs).toarray()
df = pd.DataFrame(matrix, index=docs, columns=tfidf.get_feature_names())
for doc in docs:
print(' '.join(word for word in doc.split() if word not in ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS))
This prints out:
tfidf
does tfidf stand
tfidf does stand
tfidf
don't I use tfidf
1 10 people use tfidf
Now let's print df:
10 and does don for in is \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
it people stand tfidf use \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
what why
what is tfidf 1.0 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 1.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 2.0 0.0
tfidf is what 1.0 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 1.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 0.0 0.0
Notes:
use_idf=False, norm=None
when these are set, it's equivalent to using sklearn's CountVectorizer. It will just return counts.token_pattern
to something like token_pattern=r"\b\w[\w']+\b"
to include apostrophes.Let's remove stopwords and look at df again:
tfidf = TfidfVectorizer(use_idf=False, norm=None, stop_words='english', ngram_range=(1, 2))
Outputs:
10 10 people does does stand \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
does tfidf don don use people \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
people use stand tfidf \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 1.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0 1.0 1.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 0.0 1.0 1.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 1.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 0.0 1.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 1.0 0.0 1.0
tfidf does tfidf stand use \
what is tfidf 0.0 0.0 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0 1.0 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 1.0 0.0 0.0
tfidf is what 0.0 0.0 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 0.0 0.0 1.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 0.0 0.0 1.0
use tfidf
what is tfidf 0.0
what does tfidf stand for 0.0
what is tfidf and what does it stand for 0.0
tfidf is what 0.0
why don't I use tfidf 1.0
1 in 10 people use tfidf 1.0
Take-aways:
don't I use
had the 't
stripped off and because I
was less than two characters, it was removed so the words were joined to don use
... which actually wasn't the structure and could potentially change the structure a bit!
- does it make sense to use max_df/min_df arguments together with use_idf argument?
My opinion, the whole point of term-frequency inverse document frequency is to allow re-weighting of the highly frequent words (words that would appear a the top of a sorted frequency list). This re-weighting will take the highest frequency ngrams and move them down the list to a lower position. Therefore, it's supposed to handle max_df
scenarios.
Maybe it's more of a personal choice whether you want to move them down the list ("re-weight" / de-prioritize them) or remove them completely.
I use min_df
a lot and it makes sense to use min_df
if you're working with a huge dataset because rare words won't add value and will just cause a lot of processing issues. I don't use max_df
much but I'm sure there are scenarios when working with data like all of Wikipedia that this might make sense to remove the top x%.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With