UICollectionViewFlowLayout vs subclassing UICollectionViewLayout

Question

I know the documented advice is to use UICollectionViewFlowLayout if you are doing anything "like a grid or a line-based breaking layout". However, I am not sure this is true for my case.

I want a grid but do not want a line-breaking layout. Items should be laid out infinitely both horizontally and vertically without ever stacking. Essentially, a giant chessboard that scrolls horizontally or vertically if content goes beyond the frame.

To subclass UICollectionViewFlowLayout I would have to:

1. Override prepareLayout to stop the layout from wrapping items. This seems like a lot of work.
2. Override collectionViewContentSize.

Apple says they have done "lots of hard work" in crafting UICollectionViewFlowLayout, so I should leverage it if I can. But if I have to override prepareLayout to turn off line-breaking, I suspect that I am throwing away a large part of their work. Of their work that is left, I probably will not use most of it anyway (for example, minimumLineSpacingForSectionAtIndex).

Because the layout I want is so simple, I suspect that I should subclass UICollectionViewLayout instead, because:

1. I will have a simpler and cleaner implementation with everything in one layout class instead of spread between a subclass and a delegate.
2. I don't think it will be that much harder than subclassing UICollectionViewFlowLayout because I have to override prepareLayout in both cases, and I suspect that is where all the hard work will be.
3. I'll be in a better position to tweak other UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes in custom ways than trying to add another kludge on top of a UICollectionViewFlowLayout subclass.

Is my conclusion correct?

Answer 1

UICollectionViewFlowLayout can't support two directions anyway, it scrolls along one axis only, either horizontally or vertically. So you have to subclass UICollectionViewLayout not UICollectionViewFlowLayout.

Then you have to override prepareForLayout, layoutsAttributesForElementsInRect methods as you said correctly..