Are contexts (the objects manipulated by functions in ucontext.h
) allowed to be shared across threads? That is, can I swapcontext
with the second argument being a context created in makecontext
on another thread? A test program seems to show this working on Linux. I can't find documentation one way or the other on this, whereas Windows fibers appear to explicitly support such a use case. Is this safe and OK to do in general? Is it standard POSIX behavior that this should work?
Actually, there was an NGPT - threading library for linux, which uses not a current 1:1 threading model (each user thread is the kernel thread or LWP), but a M:N threading model (several user threads corresponds to another, smaller number of kernel threads).
According to ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/Linux/NGPT/ngpt-0.9.4.tar.gz/ngpt-0.9.4/pth_sched.c:170 pth_scheduler it was possible of moving user thread contexts between native (kernel) threads:
/*
* See if the thread is unbound...
* Break out and schedule if so...
*/
if (current->boundnative == 0)
break;
/*
* See if the thread is bound to a different native thread...
* Break out and schedule if not...
*/
if (current->boundnative == this_sched->lastrannative)
break;
To save and restore user threads, the ucontext can be used ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/Linux/NGPT/ngpt-0.9.4.tar.gz/ngpt-0.9.4/pth_mctx.c:64 and seems this was a preferred method (mcsc
):
/*
* save the current machine context
*/
#if PTH_MCTX_MTH(mcsc)
#define pth_mctx_save(mctx) \
( (mctx)->error = errno, \
getcontext(&(mctx)->uc) )
#elif
....
/*
* restore the current machine context
* (at the location of the old context)
*/
#if PTH_MCTX_MTH(mcsc)
#define pth_mctx_restore(mctx) \
( errno = (mctx)->error, \
(void)setcontext(&(mctx)->uc) )
#elif PTH_MCTX_MTH(sjlj)
...
#if PTH_MCTX_MTH(mcsc)
/*
* VARIANT 1: THE STANDARDIZED SVR4/SUSv2 APPROACH
*
* This is the preferred variant, because it uses the standardized
* SVR4/SUSv2 makecontext(2) and friends which is a facility intended
* for user-space context switching. The thread creation therefore is
* straight-foreward.
*/
So, even if NGPT is dead and unused, it selected *context() for switching user threads even between kernel threads. I assume, that using *context() family is safe enough on Linux.
There can be some problems when mixing ucontexts and other native threads library. I will consider a NPTL, which is standard linux native threading library since glibc 2.4. The main problem is THREAD_SELF - pointer to struct pthread
of the current thread. TLS (Thread-local storage) also works via THREAD_SELF. The THREAD_SELF is usually stored on register (r2 on powerpc, %gs
on x86, etc). get/setcontext might save and restore this register breaking internals of native pthread library (e.g. thread-local storage, thread identification, etc).
The glibc setcontext will not save/restore %gs
register to be compatible with pthreads:
/* Restore the FS segment register. We don't touch the GS register
since it is used for threads. */
movl oFS(%eax), %ecx
movw %cx, %fs
You should check, does setcontext saves THREAD_SELF register on the architecture you are interested in. Also, your code can be not portable between OSes and libc
s.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With