Ok. this is very simple, just to remove an annoying error message.
I have an abstract class Router:
export abstract class Router {
}
And an interface like this
interface IModule {
name: string;
forms: Array<IForm>,
route: typeof Router
}
Now I have a class which looks like this, and many others based on Router abstract
export class Module1 extends Router {
}
Now, I want to instantiate the route like this:
let module: IModule = {
name: "My Module",
forms: [],
route: Module1
}
let router = new module.route();
// TS2511: Cannot create an instance of an abstract class.
The code run just fine, and the instance of router = new Module1() is made properly, but I obviously doesn't write it properly in Typescript because I see TS2511: Cannot create an instance of an abstract class.
when transpiling.
What is the correct way to define this?
Thank you
We cannot create an instance of an abstract class. An abstract class typically includes one or more abstract methods or property declarations. The class which extends the abstract class must define all the abstract methods.
Implementation of Abstract Classes in TypeScript The function Object() { [native code] } declares the firstName and lastName attributes in the Employee class. The method getStipend() is an abstract method. The logic will be implemented in the derived class based on the employee type.
Object-oriented programs contain concretions and abstractions. Abstract classes are one of two ways we can implement abstractions in object-oriented programming. Use abstract classes to define shared behavior or implement the Template Method pattern.
TypeScript defines a constructor using the constructor keyword. A constructor is a function and hence can be parameterized. The this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. Here, the parameter name and the name of the class's field are the same.
When you have an abstract class, it's constructor is only invokable from a derived class, since the class is abstract and should not be instantiated. This carries over when you type something as typeof AbstractClass
, the constructor will not be callable.
The solution would to be to not use typeof Router
but rather a constructor signature that returns a Router
interface IModule {
name: string;
forms: Array<IForm>,
route: new () => Router
}
Another solution if you need to access static methods of Router
is to create an interface derived from typeof Router
which will erase the abstractness of the constructor:
export abstract class Router {
static m(): void { console.log("Router"); }
}
type RouterClass = typeof Router;
interface RouterDerived extends RouterClass { }
interface IModule {
name: string;
route: RouterDerived
}
export class Module1 extends Router {
static m(): void { console.log("Module1"); }
}
let module: IModule = {
name: "My Module",
route: Module1
}
module.route.m();
let router = new module.route();
Note, second part of the accepted answer covers:
if you need to access static methods of Router ...
The proposed solution doesn't actually work. Just spent fair bit of time trying to figure this out so though I'd add: the way to do this is:
type RouterDerived = {new (): Router} & typeof Router;
Full example playground.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With