Today I created a map, where the value type has no default constructor. I was surprised that I could not use operator[] to insert the elements to this map, but I had to use the insert method.
So, what exactly are requirements for the key and value types for std::map?
Here is short example :
#include <map>
struct A
{
A(int){}
};
int main()
{
std::map< int, A > m;
A a1(2);
A a2(3);
A a3(4);
m[5] = a1;
m[3] = a2;
m[2] = a3;
}
I am compiling like this :
[vladimir@sandbox tmp]$ g++ b5.cpp -Wall -Wextra -ansi -pedantic
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../include/c++/4.3.0/bits/stl_map.h: In member function ‘_Tp& std::map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const _Key&) [with _Key = int, _Tp = A, _Compare = std::less<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const int, A> >]’:
b5.cpp:14: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../include/c++/4.3.0/bits/stl_map.h:419: error: no matching function for call to ‘A::A()’
b5.cpp:5: note: candidates are: A::A(int)
b5.cpp:4: note: A::A(const A&)
operator[]
does indeed require default-constructibility because the semantics of this method mandate that if the key doesn’t yet exist, an appropriate entry is created. Thus:
map<TKey, TValue> mymap;
TKey foo = …;
TValue& x = mymap[foo];
will create and store a new object TValue()
if foo
doesn’t exist in the map, and return a reference to it.
This site make a great STL reference: http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/
Basically, it says that map takes has mandatory 2 type arguments, Key
and Data
. Data
needs to be Assignable
, as Daniel said. Key
, however, is stated to need to be a type that can be used with the type Compare
, i.e. Compare
designates a function object whose parameters are of type Key
. In this case, the default Compare
function object is std::less<T>
, which is a Strict Weak Ordering
that compares objects of type T
using the operator<
. Hence, if you do not change the Compare
type, i.e. use the default, std::less<T>
will be used with type Key
, and thus operator<
will be used with type Key
, and thus Key
needs to be comparable with operator<
.
Hope that helps! I know it's a bit gratuitous and I don't mean to be condescending, but I just want to make sure it's absolutely clear how to go about reasoning about this.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With