I have defined an identity function and a composition function:
def identity[T](x: T): T = x
def composition[A, B, C](f: A => B, g: B => C)(x: A) = g(f(x))
I am trying to assert that the identity function can be applied on both sides with the same result:
assert(composition((x: Int) => x + 1, identity)(3) == composition(identity, (x: Int) => x + 1)(3))
However, I am getting these errors:
Error:(7, 40) type mismatch;
found : Nothing => Nothing
required: Int => Nothing
assert(composition((x: Int) => x + 1, identity)(3) == composition(identity, (x: Int) => x + 1)(3));}
And:
Error:(7, 68) type mismatch;
found : Nothing => Nothing
required: A => Nothing
assert(composition((x: Int) => x + 1, identity)(3) == composition(identity, (x: Int) => x + 1)(3));}
Why is this the case?
This is the case because the compiler is having difficulty inferring the types properly, specifically inferring what A
is. You can help him by placing A
as the first argument and each function in a separate parameter list:
def composition[A, B, C](x: A)(f: A => B)(g: B => C) = g(f(x))
And now this works as expected:
scala> :pa
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
def identity[T](x: T): T = x
def composition[A, B, C](x: A)(f: A => B)(g: B => C) = g(f(x))
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
identity: [T](x: T)T
composition: [A, B, C](x: A)(f: A => B)(g: B => C)C
scala> println(composition(3)((x: Int) => x + 1)(identity) == composition(3)(identity)((x: Int) => x + 1))
true
Alternatively, you can specify the type parameter explicitly to help the compiler infer the right type:
println(composition((x: Int) => x + 1, identity[Int], 3) ==
composition(identity[Int], (x: Int) => x + 1, 3))
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With