How's this possible?
Time.now.utc.to_date + 1.month + 15.days #=> Mon, 01 Dec 2014
Time.now.utc.to_date + 15.days + 1.month #=> Sun, 30 Nov 2014
Has anyone seen it?
/edit
I guess I asked the question a wrong way. How do you guys explain this then?
Time.now.utc.to_date + (15.days + 1.month) #=> Mon, 08 Dec 2014
Time.now.utc.to_date + (1.month + 15.days) #=> Tue, 09 Dec 2014
(15.days + 1.month) #=> 3888000
(1.month + 15.days) #=> 3888000
First let see Integer#month, it returns an instance of ActiveSupport::Duration
. At the rails console:
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > elapsed = 1.month
=> 2592000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > elapsed.value
=> 2592000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > elapsed.parts
=> [[:months,1]]
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > elapsed.is_a? ActiveSupport::Duration
=> true
It's time for the method: ActiveSupport::Duration#+
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1 = 1.month + 15.days
=> 3888000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum2 = 15.days + 1.month
=> 3888000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1.value
=> 3888000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1.parts
=> [[:months,1],[:days,15]]
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum2.value
=> 3888000
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum2.parts
=> [[:days,15],[:months,1]]
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1 == sum2
=> true
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1.value == sum2.value
=> true
~/rails/rfinan (1296000):1 > sum1.parts == sum2.parts
=> false
Now Date#+, the ActiveSupport version.
def plus_with_duration(other) #:nodoc:
if ActiveSupport::Duration === other
other.since(self)
else
plus_without_duration(other)
end
end
alias_method :plus_without_duration, :+
alias_method :+, :plus_with_duration
That means: if I send :+ to a Date instance with a ActiveSupport::Duration instance as parameter, it calls ActiveSupport::Duration#since, and the last one calls ActiveSupport::Duration#sum, that injects over the date instance, and calls Date#advance on each of the parts of duration instance:
def sum(sign, time = ::Time.current) #:nodoc:
parts.inject(time) do |t,(type,number)|
if t.acts_like?(:time) || t.acts_like?(:date)
if type == :seconds
t.since(sign * number)
else
t.advance(type => sign * number)
end
else
raise ::ArgumentError, "expected a time or date, got #{time.inspect}"
end
end
end
Remmember sum1.parts != sum2.parts?, sum send advance to the date instance orderly. Let see what means Date#advance
def advance(options)
options = options.dup
d = self
d = d >> options.delete(:years) * 12 if options[:years]
d = d >> options.delete(:months) if options[:months]
d = d + options.delete(:weeks) * 7 if options[:weeks]
d = d + options.delete(:days) if options[:days]
d
end
When advance recive month: 1
it calls Date#>> from stdlib, that work diferently of ActiveSupport::Duration#+. At irb:
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 1
=> #<Date: 2014-11-30 ((2456992j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 2
=> #<Date: 2014-12-31 ((2457023j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 3
=> #<Date: 2015-01-31 ((2457054j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 4
=> #<Date: 2015-02-28 ((2457082j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 5
=> #<Date: 2015-03-31 ((2457113j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 12
=> #<Date: 2015-10-31 ((2457327j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 1200
=> #<Date: 2114-10-31 ((2493486j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
~ (main) > Date.new(2014,10,31) >> 12000
=> #<Date: 3014-10-31 ((2822204j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
It's clear that Date#>> don't add days, add months and keep the day number. if the day isn't valid for the target month, it fixes it. Adding a fix number of months doesn't fixes the number of days added, because depend on the start date.
Now we can say that Date#+ is not the same of ActiveSupport::Duration#+, and we know why.
The anwer is Date#+ called with an ActiveSupport::Duration instance (say duration) doesn't care about duration.value, it uses duration.parts, which are different in each case.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With