for(i=0; i<n; i++)
{
a[i]=0;
for(i=0; i<n; i++)
{
for(j=0; j<n; j++)
{
a=3;
}
}
}
This is a triple nested loop. My book states that the running time is: O(N) + O(N^2) = O(N^2)
Shouldn't it be O(N^3)? All 3 loops depend on each other. It will run for N*N*N times.
It is because the loop #1
and loop #2
are using the same count variable, i
during comparison.
At the end of the 2nd loop using i
, the value of i
is n which makes it break out of the outer loop as well. One loop is completely redundant there.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
int x = 0;
int n = 20;
int i, j;
for(i=0; i<n; i++) //this loop runs once
{
for(i=0; i<n; i++) //this loop runs n times
{
for(j=0; j<n; j++) //this loop also runs n times
{
x++;
}
}
}
printf("%d", x);
}
It is in O(N^2)
time that the whole is running.
Example
I don't think that they is an error in your book. You have to look at your code more deeply: The two first loops use the same variable for the loop, so what will happen is the following:
after ther first bracket, i is equal to 0 and you go to the second loop. When the second loop ends the first one will end to because both loops use the condition i
Actually I don't see where the O(N) comes from but the global complexity should be of O(N^2)
This isn't n^3 since the variable i is reused in the inner loop, making it n^2. Not sure where the book gets the O(n) in that though.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With