When we talk about intrinsic lock we refer to the object for which we ask the lock or for the synchronized method?
The lock is on the object or on it's sync method?
I'm confused!
In Java, an intrinsic lock is implied by each use of the synchronized keyword
Each use of the synchronized keyword is associated with one of the two types of intrinsic lock:
an "instance lock", attached to a single object
a "static lock", attached to a class
If a method is declared as synchronized, then it will acquire either the instance lock or the static lock when it is invoked, according to whether it is an instance method or a static method.
The two types of lock have similar behaviour, but are completely independent of each other.
Acquiring the instance lock only blocks other threads from invoking a synchronized instance method; it does not block other threads from invoking an un-synchronized method, nor does it block them from invoking a static synchronized method.
Similarly, acquiring the static lock only blocks other threads from invoking a static synchronized method; it does not block other threads from invoking an un-synchronized method, nor does it block them from invoking a synchronized instance method.
Outside of a method header, synchronized(this) acquires the instance lock.
The static lock can be acquired outside of a method header in two ways:
synchronized(Blah.class), using the class literal
synchronized(this.getClass()), if an object is available
Intrinsic locks are on the object:
class A
{
public synchronized void method1(){...}
public synchronized void method2(){...}
}
If thread A is in method1 then threadB cannot enter method2.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With