I'm running in a corner case here with regarding the difference with scoping of instance methods/properties in C#. Here is the code:
public class Base
{
public EventHandler Click {get;set;}
public Base(EventHandler clickHandler)
{
this.Click = clickHandler;
}
}
public class Derived: Base
{
public Derived(): base((sender, e) => Execute())
{
}
private void Execute()
{
}
}
The code compiles fine on MonoDevelop 3.0, but gives an error in VS2010 saying: An object reference is required for the non-static field, method, or property "Base.Execute" Basically, it boils down to the fact that when calling base class's constructor from derived class's constructor, MS's C# compiler does not allow access to derived class's methods/properties, etc. How so?
The standard monocrystalline cell presents a uniform back surface field (BSF), whereas the mono PERC solar cell presents local BSF atop passivation and SINx capping layers, which significantly improves the capture of light and electrons.
Monocrystalline solar panels are more efficient than amorphous panels. This means they require less space to produce the same amount of electricity. Monocrystalline solar panels also have a longer lifespan and are more resistant to environmental degradation.
Pros: Monocrystalline solar panels have the highest efficiency rates, typically in the 15-20% range. This high efficiency rate means they produce more power per square foot, and are therefore very space-efficient. Monocrystalline solar panels tend to be more efficient in warm weather.
The main difference between the two technologies is in the crystal purity of the panel cells. Monocrystalline solar panels have solar cells made from a single crystal of silicon while polycrystalline solar panels have solar cells made from several fragments of silicon melted together.
The VS compiler follows the specification. Not sure what is the reason it is allowed in Mono implemetation.
C# Specification, section 10.11.1 Constructor initializers:
An instance constructor initializer cannot access the instance being created. Therefore it is a compile-time error to reference this in an argument expression of the constructor initializer, as is it a compile-time error for an argument expression to reference any instance member through a simple-name.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With