I read from < Essential ASP.NET with Examples in C# > the following statement:
Another useful property to know about is the static Current property of the HttpContext class. This property always points to the current instance of the HttpContext class for the request being serviced. This can be convenient if you are writing helper classes that will be used from pages or other pipeline classes and may need to access the context for whatever reason. By using the static Current property to retrieve the context, you can avoid passing a reference to it to helper classes. For example, the class shown in Listing 4-1 uses the Current property of the context to access the QueryString and print something to the current response buffer. Note that for this static property to be correctly initialized, the caller must be executing on the original request thread, so if you have spawned additional threads to perform work during a request, you must take care to provide access to the context class yourself.
I am wondering about the root cause of the bold part, and one thing leads to another, here is my thoughts:
We know that a process can have multiple threads. Each of these threads have their own stacks, respectively. These threads also have access to a shared memory area, the heap.
The stack then, as I understand it, is kind of where all the context for that thread is stored. For a thread to access something in the heap it must use a pointer, and the pointer is stored on its stack.
So when we make some cross-thread calls, we must make sure that all the necessary context info is passed from the caller thread's stack to the callee thread's stack.
But I am not quite sure if I made any mistake.
Any comments will be deeply appreciated.
Thanks.
Here the stack is limited to user stack.
The HttpContext is NOT thread safe, accessing it from multiple threads can result in exceptions, data corruption and generally unpredictable results.
The HttpContext encapsulates all the HTTP-specific information about a single HTTP request. When an HTTP request arrives at the server, the server processes the request and builds an HttpContext object. This object represents the request which your application code can use to create the response.
Current property, instead it is available in the HttpContext class in ASP.Net Core applications. Session can be enabled using the Configure method. Inside this method, you will have to call the UseSession method of the app object. Note: It is mandatory to call the UseSession method before the UseMvc method.
If you're writing custom middleware for the ASP.NET Core pipeline, the current request's HttpContext is passed into your Invoke method automatically: public Task Invoke(HttpContext context) { // Do something with the current HTTP context... }
There are four things working together to cause the behavior you are asking about:
HttpContext.Current
Thread.CurrentThread
Thread.CurrentThread
is static but references a different Thread
object in every threadHttpContext.Current
actually points to Thread.CurrentThread.ExecutionContext.IllogicalCallContext.HostContext
Conclusions we can draw from the above givens:
HttpContext
is an instance object and not static we need its reference to access itHttpContext.Current
actually points to a property on Thread.CurrentThread
, changing Thread.CurrentThread
to a different object will likely change HttpContext.Current
Thread.CurrentThread
' changes when switching threads, HttpContext.Current
also changes when switching threads (in this case HttpContext.Current
becomes null).Bringing this all together, what causes HttpContext.Current
to not work in a new Thread? The Thread.CurrentThread
reference change, which happens when switching threads, changes the HttpContext.Current
reference, which prevents us from getting to the HttpContext instance we want.
To reiterate, the only magic thing going on here is Thread.CurrentThread
referencing a different object in every Thread. HttpContext works just like any other instance object. Since threads in the same AppDomain can reference the same objects, all we have to do is pass a reference for HttpContext to our new thread. There is no context info to load or anything like that. (there are some fairly serious potential gotchas with passing around HttpContext to other threads but nothing to prevent you from doing it).
A few final side notes I came across while researching:
In some cases a Thread's ExecutionContext is 'flowed' (copied) from one Thread to another. Why then is HttpContext not 'flowed' to our new Thread? Because HttpContext doesn't implement the ILogicalThreadAffinative interface. A class stored in the ExecutionContext is only flowed if it implements ILogicalThreadAffinative.
How does ASP.NET move HttpContext from Thread to Thread (Thread-Agility) if it isn't flowed? I'm not entirely sure, but it looks like it might pass it in HttpApplication.OnThreadEnter()
.
I think I've found a suitable explanation here: http://odetocode.com/articles/112.aspx
To summarize, the code-behind of HttpContext.Current
looks like this:
public static HttpContext get_Current() { return (CallContext.GetData("HtCt") as HttpContext); }
with CallContext
functioning as thread-local storage (i.e. each thread will see a different copy of the data and cannot access the copies seen by other threads). Hence, once the current context is initialized on one thread, subsequent accesses by other threads will result in a NullReferenceException
, since the property is thread-local to the initial thread.
So yes, your initial explanation was close, in the sense that it is a problem of data being visible only to a single thread.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With