I realized my ThreadPoolExecutor with PriorityBlockingQueue like in this example: https://stackoverflow.com/a/12722648/2206775
and wrote a test:
PriorityExecutor executorService = (PriorityExecutor) PriorityExecutor.newFixedThreadPool(16);
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("1");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 1);
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("3");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 3);
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("2");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 2);
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("5");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 5);
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("4");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 4);
executorService.shutdown();
try {
executorService.awaitTermination(30, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
But in the end, I don't get 1 2 3 4 5, I get a random order of those numbers. Is there a problem with the test, or something else? And if first, how can it be tested correctly?
One of the added Advantage of using ThreadPoolTaskExecutor of Spring is that it is well suited for management and monitoring via JMX. The default configuration of core pool size is 1, max pool size and queue capacity as 2147483647.
You can call the cancel() function on the Future object to cancel the task before it has started running. If your task has already started running, then calling cancel() will have no effect and you must wait for the task to complete.
ThreadPoolExecutor is an ExecutorService to execute each submitted task using one of possibly several pooled threads, normally configured using Executors factory methods. It also provides various utility methods to check current threads statistics and control them.
BlockingQueue is an integral part of an Executor. BlockingQueue is used for storing the tasks when all the available threads are busy executing tasks and a new thread cannot be created.
The priority is only taken into account if the pool is fully busy and you submit several new tasks. If you define your pool with only one thread, you should get the expected output. In your example, all tasks get executed concurrently and which one finishes first is somewhat random.
By the way the linked implementation has a problem and throws an exception if your queue is full and you submit new tasks.
See below a working example of what you are trying to achieve (I have overriden newTaskFor
in a simplistic way, just to make it work - you might want to improve that part).
It prints: 1 2 3 4 5
.
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
PriorityExecutor executorService = (PriorityExecutor) PriorityExecutor.newFixedThreadPool(1);
executorService.submit(getRunnable("1"), 1);
executorService.submit(getRunnable("3"), 3);
executorService.submit(getRunnable("2"), 2);
executorService.submit(getRunnable("5"), 5);
executorService.submit(getRunnable("4"), 4);
executorService.shutdown();
try {
executorService.awaitTermination(30, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static Runnable getRunnable(final String id) {
return new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println(id);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
};
}
static class PriorityExecutor extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
public PriorityExecutor(int corePoolSize, int maximumPoolSize,
long keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit, BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue) {
super(corePoolSize, maximumPoolSize, keepAliveTime, unit, workQueue);
}
//Utitlity method to create thread pool easily
public static ExecutorService newFixedThreadPool(int nThreads) {
return new PriorityExecutor(nThreads, nThreads, 0L,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new PriorityBlockingQueue<Runnable>());
}
//Submit with New comparable task
public Future<?> submit(Runnable task, int priority) {
return super.submit(new ComparableFutureTask(task, null, priority));
}
//execute with New comparable task
public void execute(Runnable command, int priority) {
super.execute(new ComparableFutureTask(command, null, priority));
}
@Override
protected <T> RunnableFuture<T> newTaskFor(Callable<T> callable) {
return (RunnableFuture<T>) callable;
}
@Override
protected <T> RunnableFuture<T> newTaskFor(Runnable runnable, T value) {
return (RunnableFuture<T>) runnable;
}
}
static class ComparableFutureTask<T> extends FutureTask<T> implements Comparable<ComparableFutureTask<T>> {
volatile int priority = 0;
public ComparableFutureTask(Runnable runnable, T result, int priority) {
super(runnable, result);
this.priority = priority;
}
public ComparableFutureTask(Callable<T> callable, int priority) {
super(callable);
this.priority = priority;
}
@Override
public int compareTo(ComparableFutureTask<T> o) {
return Integer.valueOf(priority).compareTo(o.priority);
}
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With