I have a Postgres function:
create function myfunction(integer, text, text, text, text, text, text) RETURNS
table(id int, match text, score int, nr int, nr_extra character varying, info character varying, postcode character varying,
street character varying, place character varying, country character varying, the_geom geometry)
AS $$
BEGIN
return query (select a.id, 'address' as match, 1 as score, a.ad_nr, a.ad_nr_extra,a.ad_info,a.ad_postcode, s.name as street, p.name place , c.name country, a.wkb_geometry as wkb_geometry from "Addresses" a
left join "Streets" s on a.street_id = s.id
left join "Places" p on s.place_id = p.id
left join "Countries" c on p.country_id = c.id
where c.name = $7
and p.name = $6
and s.name = $5
and a.ad_nr = $1
and a.ad_nr_extra = $2
and a.ad_info = $3
and ad_postcode = $4);
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
This function fails to give the right result when one or more of the variables entered are NULL because ad_postcode = NULL
will fail.
What can I do to test for NULL inside the query?
How should I test null and/or empty string parameters in a method? It is common to have classes with methods with string parameters that must be validated agains null or empty, such as this example: public class MyClass { public void MyMethod (string param) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty (param)) { throw new ArgumentNullException (...);
You can test your expression against NULL using the function. There is another function called “NULLIF” [3], returns NULL if first and second arguments are equal, otherwise returns the first argument, here is the example where we are comparing 10 with 10 and we already know that these are equal so it will return NULL.
The following bash script example we show some of the way how to check for an empty or null variable using bash: Save the above script into eg. check_empty.sh and execute with our without command line arguments: Furthermore, the execution of the above script with a command line argument will trigger opposite results:
This is similar to the parameterized test feature of JUnit 4, except now these tests are much easier and much less cumbersome to write and maintain than in the old version of JUnit. If you need to provide null as a test argument value, however, there is a caveat which is described in this post. JUnit 5 introduces the concept of argument sources.
I disagree with some of the advice in other answers. This can be done with PL/pgSQL and I think it is mostly far superior to assembling queries in a client application. It is faster and cleaner and the app only sends the bare minimum across the wire in requests. SQL statements are saved inside the database, which makes it easier to maintain - unless you want to collect all business logic in the client application, this depends on the general architecture.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION func(
_ad_nr int = NULL
, _ad_nr_extra text = NULL
, _ad_info text = NULL
, _ad_postcode text = NULL
, _sname text = NULL
, _pname text = NULL
, _cname text = NULL)
RETURNS TABLE(id int, match text, score int, nr int, nr_extra text
, info text, postcode text, street text, place text
, country text, the_geom geometry)
LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
$func$
BEGIN
-- RAISE NOTICE '%', -- for debugging
RETURN QUERY EXECUTE concat(
$$SELECT a.id, 'address'::text, 1 AS score, a.ad_nr, a.ad_nr_extra
, a.ad_info, a.ad_postcode$$
, CASE WHEN (_sname, _pname, _cname) IS NULL THEN ', NULL::text' ELSE ', s.name' END -- street
, CASE WHEN (_pname, _cname) IS NULL THEN ', NULL::text' ELSE ', p.name' END -- place
, CASE WHEN _cname IS NULL THEN ', NULL::text' ELSE ', c.name' END -- country
, ', a.wkb_geometry'
, concat_ws('
JOIN '
, '
FROM "Addresses" a'
, CASE WHEN NOT (_sname, _pname, _cname) IS NULL THEN '"Streets" s ON s.id = a.street_id' END
, CASE WHEN NOT (_pname, _cname) IS NULL THEN '"Places" p ON p.id = s.place_id' END
, CASE WHEN _cname IS NOT NULL THEN '"Countries" c ON c.id = p.country_id' END
)
, concat_ws('
AND '
, '
WHERE TRUE'
, CASE WHEN $1 IS NOT NULL THEN 'a.ad_nr = $1' END
, CASE WHEN $2 IS NOT NULL THEN 'a.ad_nr_extra = $2' END
, CASE WHEN $3 IS NOT NULL THEN 'a.ad_info = $3' END
, CASE WHEN $4 IS NOT NULL THEN 'a.ad_postcode = $4' END
, CASE WHEN $5 IS NOT NULL THEN 's.name = $5' END
, CASE WHEN $6 IS NOT NULL THEN 'p.name = $6' END
, CASE WHEN $7 IS NOT NULL THEN 'c.name = $7' END
)
)
USING $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7;
END
$func$;
Call:
SELECT * FROM func(1, '_ad_nr_extra', '_ad_info', '_ad_postcode', '_sname');
SELECT * FROM func(1, _pname := 'foo');
Since all function parameters have default values, you can use positional notation, named notation or mixed notation at your choosing in the function call. See:
More explanation for basics of dynamic SQL:
The concat()
function is instrumental for building the string. It was introduced with Postgres 9.1.
The ELSE
branch of a CASE
statement defaults to NULL
when not present. Simplifies the code.
The USING
clause for EXECUTE
makes SQL injection impossible as values are passed as values and allows to use parameter values directly, exactly like in prepared statements.
NULL
values are used to ignore parameters here. They are not actually used to search.
You don't need parentheses around the SELECT
with RETURN QUERY
.
You could do it with a plain SQL function and avoid dynamic SQL. For some cases this may be faster. But I wouldn't expect it in this case. Planning the query without unnecessary joins and predicates typically produces best results. Planning cost for a simple query like this is almost negligible.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION func_sql(
_ad_nr int = NULL
, _ad_nr_extra text = NULL
, _ad_info text = NULL
, _ad_postcode text = NULL
, _sname text = NULL
, _pname text = NULL
, _cname text = NULL)
RETURNS TABLE(id int, match text, score int, nr int, nr_extra text
, info text, postcode text, street text, place text
, country text, the_geom geometry)
LANGUAGE sql AS
$func$
SELECT a.id, 'address' AS match, 1 AS score, a.ad_nr, a.ad_nr_extra
, a.ad_info, a.ad_postcode
, s.name AS street, p.name AS place
, c.name AS country, a.wkb_geometry
FROM "Addresses" a
LEFT JOIN "Streets" s ON s.id = a.street_id
LEFT JOIN "Places" p ON p.id = s.place_id
LEFT JOIN "Countries" c ON c.id = p.country_id
WHERE ($1 IS NULL OR a.ad_nr = $1)
AND ($2 IS NULL OR a.ad_nr_extra = $2)
AND ($3 IS NULL OR a.ad_info = $3)
AND ($4 IS NULL OR a.ad_postcode = $4)
AND ($5 IS NULL OR s.name = $5)
AND ($6 IS NULL OR p.name = $6)
AND ($7 IS NULL OR c.name = $7)
$func$;
Identical call.
To effectively ignore parameters with NULL
values:
($1 IS NULL OR a.ad_nr = $1)
To actually use NULL values as parameters, use this construct instead:
($1 IS NULL AND a.ad_nr IS NULL OR a.ad_nr = $1) -- AND binds before OR
This also allows for indexes to be used.
For the case at hand, replace all instances of LEFT JOIN
with JOIN
.
db<>fiddle here - with simple demo for all variants.
Old sqlfiddle
Don't use name
and id
as column names. They are not descriptive and when you join a bunch of tables (like you do to a lot
in a relational database), you end up with several columns all named name
or id
, and have to attach aliases to sort the mess.
Please format your SQL properly, at least when asking public questions. But do it privately as well, for your own good.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With