Consider a simple class A
that can be used as a range:
struct A { ~A() { std::cout << "~A "; } const char* begin() const { std::cout << "A::begin "; return s.data(); } const char* end() const { std::cout << "A::end "; return s.data() + s.size(); } std::string s; };
If I make a temporary A
in a range-for, it works exactly as I would hope:
for (auto c : A{"works"}) { std::cout << c << ' '; } // output A::begin A::end w o r k s ~A
However, if I try to wrap the temporary:
struct wrap { wrap(A&& a) : a(std::move(a)) { } const char* begin() const { return a.begin(); } const char* end() const { return a.end(); } A&& a; }; for (auto c : wrap(A{"fails"})) { std::cout << c << ' '; } // The temporary A gets destroyed before the loop even begins: ~A A::begin A::end ^^
Why is A
's lifetime not extended for the full range-for expression, and how can I make that happen without resorting to making a copy of the A
?
The reason the lifetime of the temporary is not extended is how the standard defines range-based for loops in
6.5.4 The range-based for statement [stmt.ranged]
1 For a range-based
for
statement of the form
for (
for-range-declaration:
expression)
statementlet range-init be equivalent to the expression surrounded by parentheses
( expression )
and for a range-based
for
statement of the form
for (
for-range-declaration:
braced-init-list)
statementlet range-init be equivalent to the braced-init-list. In each case, a range-based
for
statement is equivalent to{ auto && __range = range-init; for ( auto __begin = begin-expr, __end = end-expr; __begin != __end; ++__begin ) { for-range-declaration = *__begin; statement } }
Note that auto && __range = range-init;
would extend the lifetime of a temporary returned from range-init, but it does not extend the lifetime of nested temporaries inside of range-init.
This is IMHO a very unfortunate definition and was even discussed as Defect Report 900. It seems to be the only part of the standard where a reference is implicitly bound to extend the lifetime of an expressions result without extending the lifetime of nested temporaries.
The solution is to store a copy in the wrapper - which often defeats the purpose of the wrapper.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With