I'm well aware of the contractual needs to make sure that hashCode
is consistent with equals
and that equals
is consistent with compareTo
. However, this is often violated in practice. Are there any tools, techniques, or libraries that can test for this consistency automatically?
I suspect unfortunately that the answer is "no," but it would be useful to be able to have a unit test for this sort of thing that could make use of a library call or framework rather than needing to write a custom test by hand for each case where it is important.
In case it's not clear what I mean by consistency, for hashCode
and equals
I refer to the following:
If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
For equals
and compareTo
I refer to the following:
The natural ordering for a class C is said to be consistent with equals if and only if e1.compareTo(e2) == 0 has the same boolean value as e1.equals(e2) for every e1 and e2 of class C.
This is because the comparison method of BigDecimal considers only the numeric value, but equals also considers the precision. Since 0.0 and 0.00 have different precisions, they are unequal even though they have the same numeric value.
If an object's hashcode is not the same as another object's hashcode, there is no reason to execute the equals() method: you just know the two objects are not the same. On the other hand, if the hashcode is the same, then you must execute the equals() method to determine whether the values and fields are the same.
The equals() and hashcode() are the two important methods provided by the Object class for comparing objects. Since the Object class is the parent class for all Java objects, hence all objects inherit the default implementation of these two methods.
If two objects are equal(according to equals() method) then the hashCode() method should return the same integer value for both the objects. But, it is not necessary that the hashCode() method will return the distinct result for the objects that are not equal (according to equals() method).
Guava's tests have a utility called EqualsTester
which we use as an everyday part of our unit tests to test equals
and hashCode
. Its use looks like
new EqualsTester()
.addEqualityGroup("hello", "h" + "ello")
.addEqualityGroup("world", "wor" + "ld")
.addEqualityGroup(2, 1 + 1)
.testEquals();
which tests that all values in the same group are equal and have the same hash codes, that different groups are not equal, and that various other invariants are all satisfied. You could either use it yourself, or just borrow its ideas.
I would be extremely surprised if it was possible to test without generating or explicitly specifying test values, just because that seems very likely equivalent to the halting problem.
If you're using JUnit, the extensions package has the EqualsHashCodeTestCase, which fully tests both equals and hashCode for everything outlined in the Java spec (reflexive, transitive, symmetric, etc). All you have to do is provide an equal and not equal object for the parent class to use for checking.
Since the CompareTo method is part of the Comparable interface, it's actually split out into another test case - the ComparabilityTestCase. This takes three objects - one of lesser value, equal value, and greater value. Override these and the parent class will take care of the rest.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With