I would like to have a table which in the columns can stretch but I'm having a little trouble with min and max width in css.
It also seems that theres some conflicting answers around how this works:
I would like to have the following
table{ width:100%; } .a, .b, .c { background-color: red; } .a { min-width: 10px; max-width: 20px; } .b { min-width: 40px; max-width: 45px; } .c { } <table> <tr> <td class="a">A</td> <td class="b">B</td> <td class="c">C</td> </tr> </table>
Is there a way of achieving this without javascript (ie constrained stretching of columns with a table)?
below is a table of what actually gets rendered for some different css setups:
If you set the style table-layout: fixed; on your table, you can override the browser's automatic column resizing. The browser will then set column widths based on the width of cells in the first row of the table. Change your to and remove the inside of it, and then set fixed widths for the cells in .
And min-width specify lower bound for width. So the width of the element will vary from min-width to ... (it will depend on other style). So if you specify min-width and max-width , you will set up a lower and upper bound and if both are equal it will be the same as simply specifing a width .
Combining media query expressions Max-width and min-width can be used together to target a specific range of screen sizes. @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) and (min-width: 400px) {...} The query above will trigger only for screens that are 600-400px wide.
Change column and row width To change the width, do one of the following: Select the boundary of the column or row you want to move and drag it to the width or height you want. Select the rows or columns and then select Layout and choose your height and width.
Tables work differently; sometimes counter-intuitively.
The solution is to use width
on the table cells instead of max-width
.
Although it may sound like in that case the cells won't shrink below the given width, they will actually.
with no restrictions on c, if you give the table a width of 70px, the widths of a, b and c will come out as 16, 42 and 12 pixels, respectively.
With a table width of 400 pixels, they behave like you say you expect in your grid above.
Only when you try to give the table too small a size (smaller than a.min+b.min+the content of C) will it fail: then the table itself will be wider than specified.
I made a snippet based on your fiddle, in which I removed all the borders and paddings and border-spacing, so you can measure the widths more accurately.
table { width: 70px; } table, tbody, tr, td { margin: 0; padding: 0; border: 0; border-spacing: 0; } .a, .c { background-color: red; } .b { background-color: #F77; } .a { min-width: 10px; width: 20px; max-width: 20px; } .b { min-width: 40px; width: 45px; max-width: 45px; } .c {}
<table> <tr> <td class="a">A</td> <td class="b">B</td> <td class="c">C</td> </tr> </table>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With