Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

system requirements for Visual Studio 2010

My team is currently using VS2005 with the following development PCs that are a few years old: XP, Pentium D 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM.

My gut tells me that this is going to be poor hardware for VS2010 development. I am not running VS2010 beta but I am running Blend 3 beta and the performance is bad.

Can you point me to anything that I can show my boss to convince him to buy 6 new machines for my team?

Edit below after initial answer from Jon:

I should have added that my boss wants to upgrade current machines with new hard-drives so I am trying to use this opportunity to take a look forward and see if a HD upgrade is really worth it. This HD upgrade would not just be simple installation of 2nd drive but would replace current drive and would involve backup/restore or reinstallation headaches. There would be the added benefit of 64bit development too, something that we have been talking about.

like image 728
Art Dumas Avatar asked Jul 31 '09 13:07

Art Dumas


1 Answers

Betas typically are bad in terms of performance. I know that MS is working hard to improve the performance of VS2010.

However, I have the beta running on my Samsung NC-10 netbook, so it does work on low spec machines.

Do you already find yourself frequently waiting for your machine to catch up? If so, that's the reason to give your manager: you'll be more efficient now with a new machine. If not, wait until VS2010 is out and you actually have it installed (will you even upgrade immediately?) - then if it's too slow, you can show that to your manager at that point.

Speculatively requesting an upgrade doesn't sound like a good idea to me.

like image 130
Jon Skeet Avatar answered Nov 07 '22 16:11

Jon Skeet