Switch statement fallthrough is one of my personal major reasons for loving switch
vs. if/else if
constructs. An example is in order here:
static string NumberToWords(int number) { string[] numbers = new string[] { "", "one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine" }; string[] tens = new string[] { "", "", "twenty", "thirty", "forty", "fifty", "sixty", "seventy", "eighty", "ninety" }; string[] teens = new string[] { "ten", "eleven", "twelve", "thirteen", "fourteen", "fifteen", "sixteen", "seventeen", "eighteen", "nineteen" }; string ans = ""; switch (number.ToString().Length) { case 3: ans += string.Format("{0} hundred and ", numbers[number / 100]); case 2: int t = (number / 10) % 10; if (t == 1) { ans += teens[number % 10]; break; } else if (t > 1) ans += string.Format("{0}-", tens[t]); case 1: int o = number % 10; ans += numbers[o]; break; default: throw new ArgumentException("number"); } return ans; }
The smart people are cringing because the string[]
s should be declared outside the function: well, they are, this is just an example.
The compiler fails with the following error:
Control cannot fall through from one case label ('case 3:') to another Control cannot fall through from one case label ('case 2:') to another
Why? And is there any way to get this sort of behaviour without having three if
s?
Code Inspection: Fallthrough in 'switch' statementReports a switch statement where control can proceed from a branch to the next one. Such "fall-through" often indicates an error, for example, a missing break or return .
Fallthrough in C++ Fall through is a type of error that occurs in various programming languages like C, C++, Java, Dart …etc. It occurs in switch-case statements where when we forget to add a break statement and in that case flow of control jumps to the next line.
A switch statement allows a variable to be tested for equality against a list of values. Each value is called a case, and the variable being switched on is checked for each switch case.
The syntax of the switch statement is:statement(s); break; case constant 2: statement(s);
(Copy/paste of an answer I provided elsewhere)
Falling through switch
-case
s can be achieved by having no code in a case
(see case 0
), or using the special goto case
(see case 1
) or goto default
(see case 2
) forms:
switch (/*...*/) { case 0: // shares the exact same code as case 1 case 1: // do something goto case 2; case 2: // do something else goto default; default: // do something entirely different break; }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With