I have this code:
try { someMethod(); } catch (XYZException e) { // do something without using e }
Doing this will give me a warning about declaring but never using e
, which I hate. However, I also don't want to use a catch
clause without that variable, because then it will catch all exceptions, not just XYZException
s. This seems like a fairly often occurring pattern. I know I can use #pragma warning disable 0168
to suppress the warning, but I don't really find that a very elegant solution. Is there a better way?
Solution: If variable <variable_name> or function <function_name> is not used, it can be removed. If it is only used sometimes, you can use __attribute__((unused)) . This attribute suppresses these warnings.
No nothing is wrong the compiler just warns you that you declared a variable and you are not using it. It is just a warning not an error. While nothing is wrong, You must avoid declaring variables that you do not need because they just occupy memory and add to the overhead when they are not needed in the first place.
Reports the parameters that are considered unused in the following cases: The parameter is passed by value, and the value is not used anywhere or is overwritten immediately. The parameter is passed by reference, and the reference is not used anywhere or is overwritten immediately.
Define the catch clause without the exception variable as follows:
try { someMethod(); } catch (XYZException) { // do something without using e }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With