Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Suggestions on speeding up edge selection

I am building a graph editor in C# where the user can place nodes and then connect them with either a directed or undirected edge. When finished, an A* pathfinding algorithm determines the best path between two nodes.

What I have: A Node class with an x, y, list of connected nodes and F, G and H scores. An Edge class with a Start, Finish and whether or not it is directed. A Graph class which contains a list of Nodes and Edges as well as the A* algorithm

Right now when a user wants to select a node or an edge, the mouse position gets recorded and I iterate through every node and edge to determine whether it should be selected. This is obviously slow. I was thinking I can implement a QuadTree for my nodes to speed it up however what can I do to speed up edge selection?

like image 571
Dave Avatar asked May 18 '11 09:05

Dave


3 Answers

Since users are "drawing" these graphs I would assume they include a number of nodes and edges that humans would likely be able to generate (say 1-5k max?). Just store both in the same QuadTree (assuming you already have one written).

You can easily extend a classic QuadTree into a PMR QuadTree which adds splitting criteria based on the number of line segments crossing through them. I've written a hybrid PR/PMR QuadTree which supported bucketing both points and lines, and in reality it worked with a high enough performance for 10-50k moving objects (rebalancing buckets!).

like image 139
user7116 Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 12:09

user7116


So your problem is that the person has already drawn a set of nodes and edges, and you'd like to make the test to figure out which edge was clicked on much faster.

Well an edge is a line segment. For the purpose of filtering down to a small number of possible candidate edges, there is no harm in extending edges into lines. Even if you have a large number of edges, only a small number will pass close to a given point so iterating through those won't be bad.

Now divide edges into two groups. Vertical, and not vertical. You can store the vertical edges in a sorted datastructure and easily test which vertical lines are close to any given point.

The not vertical ones are more tricky. For them you can draw vertical boundaries to the left and right of the region where your nodes can be placed, and then store each line as the pair of heights at which the line intersects those lines. And you can store those pairs in a QuadTree. You can add to this QuadTree logic to be able to take a point, and search through the QuadTree for all lines passing within a certain distance of that point. (The idea is that at any point in the QuadTree you can construct a pair of bounding lines for all of the lines below that point. If your point is not between those lines, or close to them, you can skip that section of the tree.)

like image 34
btilly Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 12:09

btilly


I think you have all the ingredients already. Here's a suggestion:

  1. Index all your edges in a spatial data structure (could be QuadTree, R-Tree etc.). Every edge should be indexed using its bounding box.
  2. Record the mouse position.
  3. Search for the most specific rectangle containing your mouse position.
  4. This rectangle should have one or more edges/nodes; Iterate through them, according to the needed mode.
  5. (The tricky part): If the user has not indicated any edge from the most specific rectangle, you should go up one level and iterate over the edges included in this level. Maybe you can do without this.

This should be faster.

like image 40
Yuval F Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 12:09

Yuval F