Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Strategy for feeding a watchdog in a multitask environment

Having moved some embedded code to FreeRTOS, I'm left with an interesting dilemma about the watchdog. The watchdog timer is a must for our application. Using FreeRTOS has been a huge boon for us too. When the application was more single-tasked, it fed the watchdog at timely points in its logic flow so that we could make sure the task was making logical progress in a timely fashion.

With multiple tasks though, that's not easy. One task could be bound up for some reason, not making progress, but another is doing just fine and making enough progress to keep the watchdog fed happily.

One thought was to launch a separate task solely to feed the watchdog, and then use some counters that the other tasks increment regularly, when the watchdog task ticks, it would make sure that all the counters looked like progress was being made on all the other tasks, and if so, go ahead and feed the watchdog.

I'm curious what others have done in situations like this?

like image 995
Travis Griggs Avatar asked Feb 07 '13 18:02

Travis Griggs


People also ask

How do you use watchdog timer?

A watchdog timer is a simple countdown timer which is used to reset a microprocessor after a specific interval of time. In a properly operating system, software will periodically "pet" or restart the watchdog timer. After being restarted, the watchdog will begin timing another predetermined interval.

What is Watchdog RTOS?

for RTOS enabled embedded systems. INTRODUCTION. A Watchdog timer is an electronic timer that is used to detect and recover from errors within embedded systems. The basic principle of the Watchdog timer is simple but effective.


2 Answers

A watchdog task that monitors the status of all the other tasks is a good solution. But instead of a counter, consider using a status flag for each task. The status flag should have three possible values: UNKNOWN, ALIVE, and ASLEEP. When a periodic task runs, it sets the flag to ALIVE. Tasks that block on an asynchronous event should set their flag to ASLEEP before they block and ALIVE when the run. When the watchdog monitor task runs it should kick the watchdog if every task is either ALIVE or ASLEEP. Then the watchdog monitor task should set all of the ALIVE flags to UNKNOWN. (ASLEEP flags should remain ASLEEP.) The tasks with the UNKNOWN flag must run and set their flags to ALIVE or ASLEEP again before the monitor task will kick the watchdog again.

See the "Multitasking" section of this article for more details: http://www.embedded.com/design/debug-and-optimization/4402288/Watchdog-Timers

like image 197
kkrambo Avatar answered Oct 15 '22 04:10

kkrambo


This is indeed a big pain with watchdog timers.

My boards have an LED on a GPIO line, so I flash that in a while/sleep loop, (750ms on, 250ms off), in a next-to-lowest priority thread, (lowest is idle thread which just goes onto low power mode in a loop). I have put a wdog feed in the LED-flash thread.

This helps with complete crashes and higher-priority threads that CPU loop, but doesn't help if the system deadlocks. Luckily, my message-passing designs do not deadlock, (well, not often, anyway:).

like image 42
Martin James Avatar answered Oct 15 '22 05:10

Martin James