this may not be an earth-shattering deficiency of python, but i still wonder about the rationale behind the following behavior: when i run
source = """
print( 'helo' )
if __name__ == '__main__':
print( 'yeah!' )
#"""
print( compile( source, '<whatever>', 'exec' ) )
i get ::
File "<whatever>", line 6
#
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
i can avoid this exception by (1) deleting the trailing #
; (2)
deleting or outcommenting the if __name__ == '__main__':\n
print( 'yeah!' )
lines; (3) add a newline to very end of the
source.
moreover, if i have the source end without a trailing newline right
behind the print( 'yeah!' )
, the source will also compile without
error.
i could also reproduce this behavior with python 2.6, so it’s not new to the 3k series.
i find this error to be highly irritating, all the more since when i put above source inside a file and execute it directly or have it imported, no error will occur—which is the expected behavior.
a #
(hash) outside a string literal should always represent the
start of a (possibly empty) comment in a python source; moreover, the
presence or absence of a if __name__ == '__main__'
clause should
not change the interpretation of a soure on a syntactical level.
can anyone reproduce the above problem, and/or comment on the phenomenon?
cheers
turns out this is indeed a bug as pointed out by http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/b4842cc7abd75fe9; the bug report is at http://bugs.python.org/issue1184112; it appears to be fixed in 2.7 and 3.2.
once recognized, this bug is extremely simple to fix: since a valid python source should stay both syntactically valid and semantically unchanged when a newline is added to the source text, just mechanically do just that to any source text. this reminds me of the ;
semicolon you mechanically put in between source texts when assembling a multi-file javascript source for efficient gzipped delivery to the remote client.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With